Users report that Sonix excels in text editing capabilities, achieving a score of 9.7, while Amberscript falls behind with a score of 8.4. Reviewers mention that Sonix's intuitive interface makes it easy to make adjustments and corrections to transcriptions.
Reviewers mention that Sonix has a higher accuracy rating of 8.9 compared to Amberscript's 7.7. Users on G2 highlight that Sonix's transcription quality is often more reliable, especially for complex audio files.
G2 users note that Sonix offers superior timecode management with a score of 9.3, while Amberscript scores 8.7. Users say that this feature is particularly beneficial for video editing, allowing for precise synchronization of audio and text.
Users report that both platforms have strong support, but Sonix edges out with a quality of support score of 9.3 compared to Amberscript's 9.0. Reviewers mention that Sonix's customer service is responsive and helpful, enhancing the overall user experience.
Reviewers mention that Sonix's collaboration features score 8.2, which is on par with Amberscript, but users on G2 feel that Sonix's interface is more user-friendly for team projects, making it easier to share and edit documents collaboratively.
Users say that while both products integrate with existing applications, Sonix's API score of 7.8 is slightly better than Amberscript's, indicating that Sonix may offer more flexibility for developers looking to customize their workflows.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amberscript
No pricing available
Sonix (sonix.ai)
Premium
$5
hour
More frequent transcription needs with advanced collaboration tools.
I have also had trouble getting help. I sent this email to wecare@sonix.ai and have not gotten a response.
I’m a somewhat happy Sonix user. I’m using it to...Read more
Sonix (sonix.ai) has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.