Compare Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) and ScyllaDB 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (41.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Star Rating
(901)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)ScyllaDB
Star Rating
(423)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ScyllaDBSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Amazon RDS excels in ease of setup, with users highlighting its intuitive onboarding process and the ability to scale on demand. This operational simplicity is a significant advantage for teams looking to minimize complexity while maintaining strong security and reliability.
- Users say ScyllaDB stands out for its cost efficiency and compatibility with Cassandra, making it a great choice for businesses looking to optimize their infrastructure costs. Reviewers appreciate the high performance achieved on fewer nodes, which can lead to substantial savings.
- According to verified reviews, Amazon RDS has a higher overall satisfaction score, reflecting its strong market presence and user trust. Users frequently mention the service's reliability and the comprehensive metrics provided, which help in effective database management.
- Reviewers mention that ScyllaDB's scalability is a key feature, allowing users to seamlessly orchestrate multiple events and handle low latency effectively. This flexibility is particularly beneficial for businesses that require rapid adjustments to their database needs.
- Users appreciate that both platforms offer robust support, with ScyllaDB's team being noted for their engagement and care for user experience. However, Amazon RDS users often highlight the operational support that comes with a managed service, which can simplify ongoing maintenance.
- G2 reviewers report that while both products perform well in terms of application performance, ScyllaDB has a slight edge in handling high-throughput scenarios. Users value its ability to maintain performance with fewer resources, which can be a game-changer for resource-constrained environments.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
No pricing availableScyllaDB
No pricing availableFree Trial
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Free Trial is available
ScyllaDB
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
739
8.8
331
Ease of Use
8.8
747
8.5
340
Ease of Setup
8.9
523
8.2
248
Ease of Admin
8.7
435
8.2
125
Quality of Support
8.6
711
8.6
310
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
423
8.7
105
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
701
9.0
322
Features by Category
Management
8.8
305
Not enough data
8.9
309
Not enough data
8.8
294
Not enough data
8.9
304
Not enough data
Support
8.3
300
Not enough data
8.7
311
Not enough data
8.6
305
Not enough data
8.8
309
Not enough data
Security
8.6
298
Not enough data
8.7
314
Not enough data
8.8
308
Not enough data
8.8
311
Not enough data
Performance
8.8
305
Not enough data
8.6
299
Not enough data
8.7
307
Not enough data
8.5
293
Not enough data
8.5
297
Not enough data
Database Features
9.0
437
Not enough data
9.2
437
Not enough data
9.0
433
Not enough data
9.2
423
Not enough data
9.1
431
Not enough data
8.5
402
Not enough data
8.7
419
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
8.7
161
Not enough data
8.7
162
Availability
Not enough data
9.0
156
Not enough data
8.6
153
Not enough data
8.7
155
Performance
Not enough data
8.8
147
Security
Not enough data
8.4
140
Not enough data
8.5
143
Not enough data
8.5
141
Not enough data
8.6
142
Support
Not enough data
8.5
138
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Storage
Not enough data
8.5
69
Scalability
Not enough data
9.0
77
Not enough data
8.7
70
Security
Not enough data
8.2
63
Support
Not enough data
8.5
73
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
67
Agentic AI - Wide Column Database
Not enough data
7.5
6
Configuration
8.8
245
9.2
150
8.4
240
8.8
140
8.6
248
8.9
149
8.0
225
8.4
135
8.9
239
8.7
138
Database Administration
8.8
240
8.8
136
8.6
230
8.7
131
Feature Not Available
8.7
132
Availability
9.1
245
9.5
151
9.1
249
8.8
146
Feature Not Available
8.9
135
8.7
231
8.8
144
Security
8.3
170
8.7
122
8.6
179
8.7
125
8.4
169
8.7
125
Data Management
8.8
185
8.9
136
8.6
174
8.7
128
Database Features
9.0
437
Not enough data
9.2
437
Not enough data
9.0
433
Not enough data
9.2
423
Not enough data
9.1
431
Not enough data
8.5
402
Not enough data
8.7
419
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) and ScyllaDB are categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Unique Categories
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is categorized as Relational Databases
ScyllaDB is categorized as Key Value Databases and Wide Column Database
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
ScyllaDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Computer Software
17.0%
Financial Services
6.1%
Computer & Network Security
3.7%
Telecommunications
3.3%
Other
47.2%
Computer Software
30.1%
Information Technology and Services
12.8%
Financial Services
6.1%
Education Management
3.7%
Banking
3.7%
Other
43.6%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) used for?
2 Comments
AJ
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is a cloud-based service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that is used for managing and operating relational...Read more
An Amazon RDS performance best practice is to allocate enough RAM so that your working set resides almost completely in memory.
1 Comment
SS
niceRead more
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) has no more discussions with answers
What is the agenda for the coming quarter, what new features will be introduced?
2 Comments
PC
Planned features for Scylla Open Source 4.x and 5.x
• Enhancements to our DynamoDB compatible API (Alternator)
• Faster resumable streaming (Repair base...Read more
What are the main tradeoffs when switching to ScyllaDB?
1 Comment
Official Response from ScyllaDB
As a NoSQL database, ScyllaDB prioritizes performance and scalability over traditional relational features like complex joins or ad-hoc reporting. While it...Read more
How does ScyllaDB handle sharding and replication?
1 Comment
Official Response from ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB follows a shard-per-core design that assigns specific data partitions to individual CPU cores, reducing internal contention. It employs consistent...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
