Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) and ScyllaDB

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Star Rating
(896)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.7% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
Star Rating
(356)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.6% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ScyllaDB
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Amazon RDS excels in scalability, scoring 9.1 compared to ScyllaDB's 9.4. Reviewers mention that RDS's ability to automatically scale resources based on demand is a significant advantage for businesses experiencing fluctuating workloads.
  • Reviewers mention that while both products offer robust data replication features, Amazon RDS's user-friendly interface for setting up replication is a standout, making it easier for users to manage their data across multiple regions.
  • Users on G2 highlight that ScyllaDB shines in application performance, with a score of 9.1, as it is designed for high throughput and low latency, making it ideal for real-time applications. In contrast, RDS scores 8.8, which is still strong but may not meet the needs of the most demanding applications.
  • Reviewers say that Amazon RDS provides excellent backup capabilities, scoring 9.1, which users appreciate for its automated backup processes and point-in-time recovery options. ScyllaDB, while competent, scores lower at 8.7, indicating it may require more manual intervention for backups.
  • Users report that both products have similar indexing capabilities, scoring 8.7 each. However, reviewers mention that RDS's indexing features are more intuitive, making it easier for users to optimize their queries without extensive database knowledge.
  • G2 users highlight that Amazon RDS has a slight edge in ease of setup, scoring 8.8 compared to ScyllaDB's 8.3. Reviewers mention that RDS's guided setup process and comprehensive documentation significantly reduce the time and effort required to get started.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
No pricing available
ScyllaDB
No pricing available
Free Trial
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Free Trial is available
ScyllaDB
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
734
8.8
300
Ease of Use
8.8
741
8.6
309
Ease of Setup
8.9
517
8.3
218
Ease of Admin
8.7
433
8.2
115
Quality of Support
8.6
706
8.5
280
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
421
8.7
95
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
695
9.2
292
Features by Category
8.8
464
Not enough data
Management
8.8
303
Not enough data
8.9
307
Not enough data
8.8
293
Not enough data
8.9
302
Not enough data
Support
8.3
298
Not enough data
8.7
309
Not enough data
8.6
303
Not enough data
8.8
307
Not enough data
Security
8.6
296
Not enough data
8.7
312
Not enough data
8.8
306
Not enough data
8.8
309
Not enough data
Performance
8.7
303
Not enough data
8.6
297
Not enough data
8.7
305
Not enough data
8.5
291
Not enough data
8.4
295
Not enough data
Database Features
9.0
434
Not enough data
9.2
433
Not enough data
9.0
430
Not enough data
9.2
420
Not enough data
9.1
428
Not enough data
8.5
399
Not enough data
8.7
416
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.5
155
Data Management
Not enough data
8.6
143
Not enough data
8.6
148
Availability
Not enough data
8.9
143
Not enough data
8.5
141
Not enough data
8.6
141
Performance
Not enough data
8.7
139
Security
Not enough data
8.3
133
Not enough data
8.5
134
Not enough data
8.4
131
Not enough data
8.5
130
Support
Not enough data
8.5
128
Not enough data
8.4
135
Wide Column DatabaseHide 8 FeaturesShow 8 Features
Not enough data
8.3
75
Storage
Not enough data
8.4
66
Scalability
Not enough data
9.0
71
Not enough data
8.6
68
Security
Not enough data
8.1
63
Support
Not enough data
8.5
70
Not enough data
8.4
69
Not enough data
8.2
65
Agentic AI - Wide Column Database
Not enough data
7.0
5
Database as a Service (DBaaS)Hide 17 FeaturesShow 17 Features
8.6
270
8.8
153
Configuration
8.8
243
9.2
146
8.4
238
8.8
139
8.6
245
8.9
143
8.0
222
8.4
134
8.8
236
8.7
135
Database Administration
8.8
236
8.8
136
8.6
228
8.7
131
Feature Not Available
8.7
131
Availability
9.1
240
9.4
144
9.1
244
8.9
141
Feature Not Available
8.9
134
8.7
230
8.8
140
Security
8.3
169
8.7
122
8.6
177
8.6
123
8.4
168
8.7
123
Data Management
8.8
182
8.9
132
8.6
173
8.7
126
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Features
9.0
434
Not enough data
9.2
433
Not enough data
9.0
430
Not enough data
9.2
420
Not enough data
9.1
428
Not enough data
8.5
399
Not enough data
8.7
416
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) and ScyllaDB are categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Unique Categories
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is categorized as Relational Databases
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB is categorized as Key Value Databases and Wide Column Database
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
29.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
37.7%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
33.3%
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
40.6%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
29.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
29.9%
Reviewers' Industry
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Information Technology and Services
22.5%
Computer Software
17.0%
Financial Services
6.1%
Computer & Network Security
3.8%
Telecommunications
3.3%
Other
47.3%
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
Computer Software
29.3%
Information Technology and Services
12.8%
Financial Services
5.8%
Education Management
3.5%
Banking
3.5%
Other
45.2%
Alternatives
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) Alternatives
Oracle Database
Oracle Database
Add Oracle Database
IBM Db2
IBM Db2
Add IBM Db2
SAP HANA Cloud
SAP HANA Cloud
Add SAP HANA Cloud
Google Cloud SQL
Cloud SQL
Add Google Cloud SQL
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB Alternatives
Cassandra
Cassandra
Add Cassandra
Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Add Amazon DynamoDB
Redis Software
Redis Software
Add Redis Software
Couchbase
Couchbase
Add Couchbase
Discussions
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) Discussions
An Amazon RDS performance best practice is to allocate enough RAM so that your working set resides almost completely in memory.
1 Comment
Siddhant S.
SS
What is Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) used for?
1 Comment
ADESH J.
AJ
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is a cloud-based service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that is used for managing and operating relational...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) has no more discussions with answers
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB Discussions
What is the agenda for the coming quarter, what new features will be introduced?
2 Comments
Peter C.
PC
Planned features for Scylla Open Source 4.x and 5.x • Enhancements to our DynamoDB compatible API (Alternator) • Faster resumable streaming (Repair base...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
ScyllaDB has no more discussions with answers