Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) and Oracle Tuxedo 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ER/Studio
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (72.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Star Rating
(897)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)Oracle Tuxedo
Star Rating
(12)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (72.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Oracle TuxedoAmazon Relational Database Service (RDS) vs Oracle Tuxedo
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) overall.
- Reviewers felt that Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) meets the needs of their business better than Oracle Tuxedo.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) over Oracle Tuxedo.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
No pricing availableOracle Tuxedo
No pricing availableFree Trial
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Free Trial is available
Oracle Tuxedo
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
734
8.8
10
Ease of Use
8.8
742
8.3
10
Ease of Setup
8.9
518
8.5
8
Ease of Admin
8.7
434
7.9
7
Quality of Support
8.6
706
7.6
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
422
7.9
7
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
696
3.5
9
Features by Category
Management
8.8
304
Not enough data
8.9
308
Not enough data
8.8
294
Not enough data
8.9
303
Not enough data
Support
8.3
299
Not enough data
8.7
310
Not enough data
8.6
304
Not enough data
8.8
308
Not enough data
Security
8.6
297
Not enough data
8.7
313
Not enough data
8.8
307
Not enough data
8.8
310
Not enough data
Performance
8.8
304
Not enough data
8.6
298
Not enough data
8.7
306
Not enough data
8.5
292
Not enough data
8.5
296
Not enough data
Database Features
9.0
435
Not enough data
9.2
434
Not enough data
9.0
431
Not enough data
9.2
421
Not enough data
9.1
429
Not enough data
8.5
400
Not enough data
8.7
417
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
User Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Modernization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Performance Improvement - Application Server
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Application Server
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Configuration
8.8
244
Not enough data
8.4
239
Not enough data
8.6
246
Not enough data
8.0
223
Not enough data
8.8
237
Not enough data
Database Administration
8.8
237
Not enough data
8.6
229
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Availability
9.1
241
Not enough data
9.1
245
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
231
Not enough data
Security
8.3
170
Not enough data
8.6
178
Not enough data
8.4
169
Not enough data
Data Management
8.8
183
Not enough data
8.6
174
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) and Oracle Tuxedo share no categories
Unique Categories
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS) and Relational Databases
Oracle Tuxedo is categorized as Application Server
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Oracle Tuxedo
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
22.5%
Computer Software
17.1%
Financial Services
6.1%
Computer & Network Security
3.8%
Telecommunications
3.3%
Other
47.2%
Telecommunications
27.3%
Information Technology and Services
27.3%
Banking
18.2%
Marketing and Advertising
9.1%
Hospital & Health Care
9.1%
Other
9.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
An Amazon RDS performance best practice is to allocate enough RAM so that your working set resides almost completely in memory.
1 Comment
SS
niceRead more
What is Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) used for?
1 Comment
AJ
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is a cloud-based service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that is used for managing and operating relational...Read more
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) has no more discussions with answers
Oracle Tuxedo has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
