Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) and IBM Cloud Databases for MySQL 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.7% of reviews)
Enterprise (53.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Star Rating
(896)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)IBM Cloud Databases for MySQL
Star Rating
(14)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about IBM Cloud Databases for MySQLSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Amazon RDS excels in scalability with a score of 9.1, allowing businesses to easily adjust their database resources as needed, while IBM Cloud Databases for MySQL has a slightly lower scalability score of 8.9, which may limit flexibility for rapidly growing applications.
- Reviewers mention that IBM Cloud Databases for MySQL shines in backup capabilities, achieving a high score of 9.6, which is crucial for data recovery, whereas Amazon RDS, while still strong, has a score of 9.1, indicating it may not offer the same level of assurance in backup reliability.
- G2 users highlight that Amazon RDS has a robust data replication feature with a score of 8.8, which is essential for maintaining data consistency across multiple instances, while IBM Cloud Databases for MySQL outperforms with a score of 9.3, indicating superior capabilities in this area.
- Users on G2 report that IBM Cloud Databases for MySQL provides better anomaly detection features, scoring 8.8 compared to Amazon RDS's 8.0, suggesting that IBM's solution may offer more advanced monitoring and alerting capabilities for unusual database activity.
- Reviewers say that Amazon RDS has a strong ease of use rating of 8.8, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise, while IBM Cloud Databases for MySQL scores higher at 9.2, indicating an even more user-friendly interface and experience.
- Users report that both products have solid security features, but IBM Cloud Databases for MySQL edges out with a higher score in data masking (8.7) compared to Amazon RDS (8.3), suggesting that IBM offers more comprehensive options for protecting sensitive information.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
No pricing availableIBM Cloud Databases for MySQL
No pricing availableFree Trial
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Free Trial is available
IBM Cloud Databases for MySQL
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
734
9.4
13
Ease of Use
8.8
741
9.2
13
Ease of Setup
8.9
517
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.7
433
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.6
706
9.2
12
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
421
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
695
9.1
13
Features by Category
Management
8.8
303
Not enough data
8.9
307
Not enough data
8.8
293
Not enough data
8.9
302
Not enough data
Support
8.3
298
Not enough data
8.7
309
Not enough data
8.6
303
Not enough data
8.8
307
Not enough data
Security
8.6
296
Not enough data
8.7
312
Not enough data
8.8
306
Not enough data
8.8
309
Not enough data
Performance
8.7
303
Not enough data
8.6
297
Not enough data
8.7
305
Not enough data
8.5
291
Not enough data
8.4
295
Not enough data
Database Features
9.0
434
Not enough data
9.2
433
Not enough data
9.0
430
Not enough data
9.2
420
Not enough data
9.1
428
Not enough data
8.5
399
Not enough data
8.7
416
Not enough data
Configuration
8.8
243
8.9
12
8.4
238
8.8
12
8.6
245
8.6
13
8.0
222
8.8
11
8.8
236
8.8
12
Database Administration
8.8
236
8.9
12
8.6
228
8.5
9
Feature Not Available
8.6
11
Availability
9.1
240
8.9
12
9.1
244
9.6
12
Feature Not Available
8.9
12
8.7
230
8.8
11
Security
8.3
169
8.7
9
8.6
177
8.7
10
8.4
168
8.8
10
Data Management
8.8
182
9.3
9
8.6
173
8.5
10
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) and IBM Cloud Databases for MySQL are categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Unique Categories
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is categorized as Relational Databases
IBM Cloud Databases for MySQL has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
IBM Cloud Databases for MySQL
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
22.5%
Computer Software
17.0%
Financial Services
6.1%
Computer & Network Security
3.8%
Telecommunications
3.3%
Other
47.3%
Computer Software
38.5%
Semiconductors
15.4%
Information Technology and Services
15.4%
Retail
7.7%
Financial Services
7.7%
Other
15.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
An Amazon RDS performance best practice is to allocate enough RAM so that your working set resides almost completely in memory.
1 Comment
SS
niceRead more
What is Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) used for?
1 Comment
AJ
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is a cloud-based service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that is used for managing and operating relational...Read more
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) has no more discussions with answers
IBM Cloud Databases for MySQL has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
