Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) and Firebird 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ER/Studio
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (54.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Star Rating
(898)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)Firebird
Star Rating
(24)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about FirebirdSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Amazon RDS excels in scalability, with a score of 9.1, allowing businesses to easily adjust their database resources as needed. In contrast, Firebird's scalability score of 8.1 indicates it may not handle rapid growth as effectively.
- Reviewers mention that Amazon RDS offers superior backup capabilities, scoring 9.1, which is crucial for data recovery. Firebird, while functional, has a lower score of 7.7 in disaster recovery, suggesting it may not provide the same level of assurance in data protection.
- G2 users highlight the ease of setup for Firebird, which scored 9.5, making it a favorable choice for small businesses looking for a straightforward installation process. Conversely, Amazon RDS scored 8.8, indicating a slightly more complex setup experience.
- Reviewers say that Amazon RDS provides robust security features, particularly in encryption, where it scored 8.8. Firebird, while also secure, received a higher score of 9.4 for encryption, suggesting it may offer more advanced options in this area.
- Users on G2 report that Amazon RDS has a more comprehensive support system, with a quality of support score of 8.6, compared to Firebird's 7.0. This difference may impact user experience, especially for businesses that require reliable assistance.
- Reviewers mention that Firebird shines in data manipulation, scoring 9.1, which is higher than Amazon RDS's score of 8.5. This could be a significant advantage for users who prioritize advanced data handling capabilities.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
No pricing availableFirebird
No pricing availableFree Trial
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Free Trial is available
Firebird
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
734
9.1
19
Ease of Use
8.8
742
9.1
19
Ease of Setup
8.9
518
9.5
10
Ease of Admin
8.7
434
9.2
10
Quality of Support
8.6
706
7.0
16
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
422
8.9
9
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
696
5.7
19
Features by Category
Management
8.8
304
8.8
10
8.9
308
9.0
10
8.8
294
8.5
8
8.9
303
7.9
7
Support
8.3
299
7.6
7
8.7
310
7.5
10
8.6
304
8.1
8
8.8
308
8.8
8
Security
8.6
297
7.6
9
8.7
313
8.3
9
8.8
307
9.4
6
8.8
310
8.3
7
Performance
8.8
304
7.7
8
8.6
298
8.1
7
8.7
306
7.7
8
8.5
292
7.9
8
8.5
296
8.5
9
Database Features
9.0
435
8.9
18
9.2
434
9.0
18
9.0
431
8.8
18
9.2
421
8.1
17
9.1
429
7.9
16
8.5
400
9.1
18
8.7
417
8.9
18
Configuration
8.8
244
Not enough data
8.4
239
Not enough data
8.6
246
Not enough data
8.0
223
Not enough data
8.8
237
Not enough data
Database Administration
8.8
237
Not enough data
8.6
229
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Availability
9.1
241
Not enough data
9.1
245
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
231
Not enough data
Security
8.3
170
Not enough data
8.6
178
Not enough data
8.4
169
Not enough data
Data Management
8.8
183
Not enough data
8.6
174
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) and Firebird are categorized as Relational Databases
Unique Categories
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Firebird has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Firebird
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
22.5%
Computer Software
17.1%
Financial Services
6.1%
Computer & Network Security
3.8%
Telecommunications
3.3%
Other
47.2%
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Accounting
13.6%
Telecommunications
9.1%
Retail
4.5%
Pharmaceuticals
4.5%
Other
50.0%
Discussions
An Amazon RDS performance best practice is to allocate enough RAM so that your working set resides almost completely in memory.
1 Comment
SS
niceRead more
What is Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) used for?
1 Comment
AJ
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is a cloud-based service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that is used for managing and operating relational...Read more
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) has no more discussions with answers
Firebird has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
