Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) and Azure Database for PostgreSQL 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.7% of reviews)
Small-Business (41.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Star Rating
(896)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Star Rating
(18)3.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Database for PostgreSQLSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Amazon RDS excels in ease of setup with a score of 8.8, while Azure Database for PostgreSQL lags behind at 7.6, making RDS a more user-friendly option for quick deployments.
- Reviewers mention that Amazon RDS has a higher quality of support, scoring 8.6 compared to Azure's 7.8, indicating that users may find more reliable assistance when issues arise with RDS.
- G2 users highlight that Amazon RDS offers superior data replication features, scoring 8.9, which is crucial for businesses needing robust data backup solutions, while Azure's score of 8.1 suggests it may not be as reliable in this area.
- Users on G2 appreciate Amazon RDS's advanced indexing capabilities, scoring 8.7, which enhances query performance, whereas Azure's score of 8.9 indicates it performs well but may not offer the same level of optimization.
- Reviewers say that Amazon RDS shines in its overall scalability with a score of 9.1, making it a better choice for growing businesses, while Azure's score of 9.3 shows it is competitive but may not match RDS's flexibility in scaling resources.
- Users report that Amazon RDS provides a more comprehensive disaster recovery solution with a score of 8.7, which is essential for maintaining business continuity, while Azure's offerings in this area may not be as robust, reflecting a score of 8.5.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
No pricing availableAzure Database for PostgreSQL
No pricing availableFree Trial
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Free Trial is available
Azure Database for PostgreSQL
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
734
8.3
13
Ease of Use
8.8
741
8.5
12
Ease of Setup
8.9
517
7.2
6
Ease of Admin
8.7
433
8.1
6
Quality of Support
8.6
706
7.7
13
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
421
8.7
5
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
695
9.1
13
Features by Category
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Maintenance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
8.8
303
Not enough data
8.9
307
Not enough data
8.8
293
Not enough data
8.9
302
Not enough data
Support
8.3
298
Not enough data
8.7
309
Not enough data
8.6
303
Not enough data
8.8
307
Not enough data
Security
8.6
296
Not enough data
8.7
312
Not enough data
8.8
306
Not enough data
8.8
309
Not enough data
Performance
8.7
303
Not enough data
8.6
297
Not enough data
8.7
305
Not enough data
8.5
291
Not enough data
8.4
295
Not enough data
Database Features
9.0
434
Not enough data
9.2
433
Not enough data
9.0
430
Not enough data
9.2
420
Not enough data
9.1
428
Not enough data
8.5
399
Not enough data
8.7
416
Not enough data
Configuration
8.8
243
8.5
9
8.4
238
7.4
9
8.6
245
8.5
9
8.0
222
6.9
8
8.8
236
8.6
7
Database Administration
8.8
236
7.6
9
8.6
228
8.1
9
Feature Not Available
7.1
8
Availability
9.1
240
9.3
9
9.1
244
9.6
9
Feature Not Available
8.9
9
8.7
230
8.9
9
Security
8.3
169
Not enough data
8.6
177
Not enough data
8.4
168
Not enough data
Data Management
8.8
182
Not enough data
8.6
173
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) and Azure Database for PostgreSQL are categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Unique Categories
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is categorized as Relational Databases
Azure Database for PostgreSQL is categorized as Database Management Systems (DBMS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
22.5%
Computer Software
17.0%
Financial Services
6.1%
Computer & Network Security
3.8%
Telecommunications
3.3%
Other
47.3%
Computer Software
29.4%
Retail
5.9%
Paper & Forest Products
5.9%
Oil & Energy
5.9%
Marketing and Advertising
5.9%
Other
47.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
An Amazon RDS performance best practice is to allocate enough RAM so that your working set resides almost completely in memory.
1 Comment
SS
niceRead more
What is Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) used for?
1 Comment
AJ
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is a cloud-based service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that is used for managing and operating relational...Read more
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) has no more discussions with answers
Azure Database for PostgreSQL has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
