Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) and Azure Cosmos DB 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.7% of reviews)
Enterprise (42.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Star Rating
(896)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)Azure Cosmos DB
Star Rating
(68)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Cosmos DBSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Amazon RDS excels in its ease of setup and administration, with a score of 8.8 for both, making it a preferred choice for teams looking for a straightforward deployment process. In contrast, Azure Cosmos DB has slightly lower scores of 8.6 in both areas, indicating a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Amazon RDS offers robust data replication features, scoring 8.9, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity and availability. Azure Cosmos DB, while still competent with a score of 8.1, does not match the level of reliability that RDS provides in this aspect.
- G2 users highlight the advanced data analytics capabilities of Amazon RDS, scoring 8.6, which allows for deeper insights into data trends. Azure Cosmos DB, however, received a lower score of 7.4, suggesting that its analytics features may not be as comprehensive or user-friendly.
- Users on G2 appreciate Amazon RDS's strong security features, particularly in encryption and access control, both scoring 8.8. In comparison, Azure Cosmos DB's security features, while still solid, scored slightly lower, with data masking at 7.2, indicating potential gaps in data protection.
- Reviewers say that Amazon RDS shines in its backup and recovery options, achieving a score of 9.1, which is critical for businesses that prioritize data safety. Azure Cosmos DB's backup capabilities, scoring 8.3, may not provide the same level of assurance for users concerned about data loss.
- Users report that Amazon RDS's query language support is highly rated at 8.9, making it easier for developers to work with. Azure Cosmos DB, on the other hand, received a lower score of 7.9, which may hinder developers who rely on complex queries for their applications.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
No pricing availableAzure Cosmos DB
No pricing availableFree Trial
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Free Trial is available
Azure Cosmos DB
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
734
8.5
48
Ease of Use
8.8
741
8.2
48
Ease of Setup
8.9
517
8.0
22
Ease of Admin
8.7
433
7.7
23
Quality of Support
8.6
706
8.2
46
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
421
8.3
22
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
695
9.0
47
Features by Category
Management
8.8
303
Not enough data
8.9
307
Not enough data
8.8
293
Not enough data
8.9
302
Not enough data
Support
8.3
298
Not enough data
8.7
309
Not enough data
8.6
303
Not enough data
8.8
307
Not enough data
Security
8.6
296
Not enough data
8.7
312
Not enough data
8.8
306
Not enough data
8.8
309
Not enough data
Performance
8.7
303
Not enough data
8.6
297
Not enough data
8.7
305
Not enough data
8.5
291
Not enough data
8.4
295
Not enough data
Database Features
9.0
434
Not enough data
9.2
433
Not enough data
9.0
430
Not enough data
9.2
420
Not enough data
9.1
428
Not enough data
8.5
399
Not enough data
8.7
416
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Availability
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Performance
Not enough data
6.7
6
Security
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Storage
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Configuration
8.8
243
8.6
16
8.4
238
7.8
15
8.6
245
8.3
15
8.0
222
7.2
9
8.8
236
8.7
15
Database Administration
8.8
236
8.4
15
8.6
228
7.6
9
Feature Not Available
7.1
8
Availability
9.1
240
8.9
16
9.1
244
8.3
16
Feature Not Available
8.4
15
8.7
230
8.6
16
Security
8.3
169
7.2
6
8.6
177
7.2
6
8.4
168
5.6
6
Data Management
8.8
182
8.1
7
8.6
173
7.4
7
Database Features
9.0
434
Not enough data
9.2
433
Not enough data
9.0
430
Not enough data
9.2
420
Not enough data
9.1
428
Not enough data
8.5
399
Not enough data
8.7
416
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) and Azure Cosmos DB are categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Unique Categories
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is categorized as Relational Databases
Azure Cosmos DB is categorized as Key Value Databases, Document Databases, Graph Databases, and Columnar Databases
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Azure Cosmos DB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
22.5%
Computer Software
17.0%
Financial Services
6.1%
Computer & Network Security
3.8%
Telecommunications
3.3%
Other
47.3%
Information Technology and Services
23.7%
Computer Software
20.3%
Internet
8.5%
Retail
5.1%
Gambling & Casinos
3.4%
Other
39.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
An Amazon RDS performance best practice is to allocate enough RAM so that your working set resides almost completely in memory.
1 Comment
SS
niceRead more
What is Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) used for?
1 Comment
AJ
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is a cloud-based service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that is used for managing and operating relational...Read more
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) has no more discussions with answers
Azure Cosmos DB has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
