Link copied to clipboard

# Amazon Redshift vs SQL Server 2019 Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/amazon-redshift/sql-server-2019/export.csv)

Amazon RedshiftMicrosoft[+ Add Product](#)

Pricing

**Amazon Redshift**
Free Trial

**$1.22 - $3.26** Per hour · RA3.4xlarge

**SQL Server 2019**
No pricing available

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Time to Implement

**Amazon Redshift**
4 months

Based on 5 responses

**SQL Server 2019**
Not enough reviews yet

Return on Investment

**Amazon Redshift**
17 months

Based on 6 responses

**SQL Server 2019**
Not enough reviews yet

Perceived Cost

**Amazon Redshift**
$$$$$

**SQL Server 2019**
$$$$$

Average Discount

**Amazon Redshift**
17%

**SQL Server 2019**
Not enough reviews yet

**Pros & Cons**
from reviews

**Amazon Redshift**
[
Ease of Use (7)
](https://www.g2.com/products/amazon-redshift/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1397789&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Integrations (7)
](https://www.g2.com/products/amazon-redshift/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1396714&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Complexity (5)
](https://www.g2.com/products/amazon-redshift/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1397335&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Feature Limitations (5)
](https://www.g2.com/products/amazon-redshift/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1396004&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)

**SQL Server 2019**
[
Data Integration (1)
](https://www.g2.com/products/sql-server-2019/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1981726&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
SQL Support (1)
](https://www.g2.com/products/sql-server-2019/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1661485&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Expensive (1)
](https://www.g2.com/products/sql-server-2019/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1661333&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)

Integrations

**Amazon Redshift**
[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_de2aec2900c83942b05e5256568f5444/fivetran.jpg "Product Avatar Image")

Fivetran

](https://www.g2.com/products/fivetran/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_c9a6da64ae8882af99b80f6b94123d88/informatica-data-engineering.jpg "Product Avatar Image")

Informatica Data Engineering

](https://www.g2.com/products/informatica-data-engineering/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_948c2ad423d39bd4e10fb09ac335bd47/informatica-data-integration-and-engineering.jpg "Product Avatar Image")

Informatica Data Integration and Engineering

](https://www.g2.com/products/informatica-data-integration-and-engineering/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_c8017635a9da3e52c22a0d25c2830e40/liquibase.png "Product Avatar Image")

Liquibase

](https://www.g2.com/products/liquibase/reviews)[
View all
](https://www.g2.com/products/amazon-redshift/integrations)

**SQL Server 2019**
Not enough data

Screenshots

**Amazon Redshift**
 ![Amazon Redshift screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/92020/Screenshot6.png)

**SQL Server 2019**
No screenshot available

**Ratings**
from reviews

Meets Requirements

**Amazon Redshift**

8.7

8.7288

**SQL Server 2019**

9.0

9.054

Ease of Use

**Amazon Redshift**

8.7

8.7288

**SQL Server 2019**

9.0

9.054

Ease of Setup

**Amazon Redshift**

8.6

8.6145

**SQL Server 2019**

8.4

8.422

Ease of Admin

**Amazon Redshift**

8.4

8.4130

**SQL Server 2019**

8.3

8.318

Quality of Support

**Amazon Redshift**

8.5

8.5271

**SQL Server 2019**

8.8

8.848

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**Amazon Redshift**

8.7

8.7129

**SQL Server 2019**

8.3

8.317

Product Direction (% positive)

**Amazon Redshift**

8.9

8.9258

**SQL Server 2019**

9.3

9.349

**Features**
ratings from reviews

Data Warehouse

8.4

154

8.5

37

Columnar Databases

8.3

63

Not enough data

User Insights

**Reviewers' Company Size**

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
20.8%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
40.2%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
39.1%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
20.8%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
40.2%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
39.1%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
31.2%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
36.4%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
32.5%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
31.2%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
36.4%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
32.5%

**Reviewers' Industry**

[![Amazon Redshift](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1528476479/amazon-redshift.svg "Amazon Redshift")](https://www.g2.com/products/amazon-redshift/reviews)
Amazon Redshift

Information Technology and Services
15.2%

Computer Software
12.5%

Financial Services
7.6%

Retail
5.4%

Marketing and Advertising
4.9%

Other
54.5%

[![SQL Server 2019](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/a8a99a96fda235658139f710592f8a53/sql-server-2019.svg "SQL Server 2019")](https://www.g2.com/products/sql-server-2019/reviews)
SQL Server 2019

Computer Software
28.2%

Information Technology and Services
17.9%

Banking
6.4%

Financial Services
5.1%

Computer & Network Security
3.8%

Other
38.5%

Alternatives

**Amazon Redshift Alternatives**

 ![Google Cloud BigQuery](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/875b8a68eca98ce3458f26e9dd34cdf9/google-cloud-bigquery.svg "Google Cloud BigQuery")

[
BigQuery
](/products/google-cloud-bigquery/reviews)

 ![Snowflake](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1544409170/snowflake.svg "Snowflake")

[
Snowflake
](/products/snowflake/reviews)

 ![Rocket Vertica](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/0e27517827bbb573fb7f07523fb524b7/rocket-vertica.svg "Rocket Vertica")

[
Rocket Vertica
](/products/rocket-vertica/reviews)

 ![Cloudera](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/dcfb9e6879febb34cef773ddde921835/cloudera.svg "Cloudera")

[
Cloudera
](/products/cloudera/reviews)

**SQL Server 2019 Alternatives**

 ![Databricks](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/135d1c9e39e19ef56dc8d0bf90fce20f/databricks.svg "Databricks")

[
Databricks
](/products/databricks/reviews)

 ![Snowflake](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1544409170/snowflake.svg "Snowflake")

[
Snowflake
](/products/snowflake/reviews)

 ![Exadata Database Service](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_ebc397a24911cc79962c8898752c5359/exadata-database-service.png "Exadata Database Service")

[
Oracle Exadata Cloud Service
](/products/exadata-database-service/reviews)

 ![Google Cloud BigQuery](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/875b8a68eca98ce3458f26e9dd34cdf9/google-cloud-bigquery.svg "Google Cloud BigQuery")

[
BigQuery
](/products/google-cloud-bigquery/reviews)

## Amazon Redshift vs Microsoft FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 14, 2026

### What is the difference between Microsoft vs Amazon Redshift?

Microsoft stands out for higher overall reviewer satisfaction, while Amazon Redshift is favored for integrations and fast querying.

| [Microsoft](https://www.g2.com/products/sql-server-2019/reviews) | [Amazon Redshift](https://www.g2.com/products/amazon-redshift/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.5/5 (83 reviews) | 4.3/5 (404 reviews) |
| Mid-Market | Mid-Market |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Data Integration | Fast Querying |

### How do the pricing models of Microsoft and Amazon Redshift compare?

Microsoft receives higher satisfaction scores for value, while Amazon Redshift reviewers frequently mention pricing complexity and cost concerns.

- **Microsoft:** Reviewers note high licensing costs but also describe the product as cost-effective for its performance and features.
- **Amazon Redshift:** Recent reviews highlight flexible pay-as-you-go pricing but also cite complex pricing structures and higher costs, especially for small businesses or large-scale usage.

### What are the best alternatives to Microsoft and Amazon Redshift?

The best alternatives to Microsoft and Amazon Redshift are BigQuery, Databricks, and Snowflake.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Microsoft](https://www.g2.com/products/sql-server-2019/reviews) | 4.5/5 (83 reviews) | Mid-Market | High licensing costs, but described as cost-effective for performance | Data Integration |
| [Amazon Redshift](https://www.g2.com/products/amazon-redshift/reviews) | 4.3/5 (404 reviews) | Mid-Market | Flexible pay-as-you-go, but complex and can be expensive at scale | Fast Querying |
| [BigQuery](https://www.g2.com/products/google-cloud-bigquery/reviews) | 4.5/5 (1224 reviews) | Enterprise | — | — |
| [Databricks](https://www.g2.com/products/databricks/reviews) | 4.6/5 (1366 reviews) | Enterprise | — | — |
| [Snowflake](https://www.g2.com/products/snowflake/reviews) | 4.5/5 (763 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | — |

### Which Data Warehouse features should I prioritize when comparing Microsoft and Amazon Redshift?

Buyers should prioritize performance, scalability, integrations, ease of setup, and cost when comparing Microsoft and Amazon Redshift.

- **Performance:** Microsoft scores 9.0 on Meets Requirements and 9.0 on Ease of Use; Amazon Redshift scores 8.7 on both.
- **Scalability:** Amazon Redshift has 4 all-time mentions for scalability and 3 for scaling; Microsoft does not have published scalability mentions.
- **Integrations:** Amazon Redshift has 5 all-time mentions for integrations and 4 for easy integrations; Microsoft has 1 all-time mention for data integration.
- **Ease of Setup:** Amazon Redshift scores 8.6; Microsoft scores 8.4.
- **Cost:** Microsoft is described as expensive in 1 all-time mention; Amazon Redshift has 2 all-time mentions for being cost-effective but also frequent recent concerns about pricing complexity.

### What are the pros and cons of Microsoft vs Amazon Redshift?

Microsoft's headline strength is data integration and ease of use, while Amazon Redshift excels in fast querying and integrations.

- **Microsoft strengths:** Data integration (1 all-time mention), SQL support (1 all-time mention), high performance, robust analytics, and ease of use.
- **Microsoft trade-offs:** High licensing costs (1 all-time mention), learning curve for new features, and resource-intensive for large deployments.
- **Amazon Redshift strengths:** Fast querying (5 all-time mentions), integrations (5 all-time mentions), ease of use (4 all-time mentions), performance (4 all-time mentions), scalability (4 all-time mentions), and cost-effectiveness (2 all-time mentions).
- **Amazon Redshift trade-offs:** Feature limitations (4 all-time mentions), software limitations (4 all-time mentions), complexity (3 all-time mentions), query optimization challenges (3 all-time mentions), and higher costs for large-scale or small business use.

### Is Microsoft or Amazon Redshift better for small businesses?

Microsoft is better suited for small businesses based on reviewer sentiment and segment alignment.

- **Microsoft:** Largest segment is Mid-Market, but recent reviews highlight suitability for medium-sized companies and ease of use for smaller projects.
- **Amazon Redshift:** Largest segment is Mid-Market, and recent reviews note that minimum pricing is high for small businesses and that it is more cost-effective at scale.

### Which Data Warehouse platform has better integrations?

Amazon Redshift is favored by reviewers for integrations, with more frequent and recent mentions than Microsoft.

- **Microsoft:** Data integration is mentioned in recent reviews, but with only 1 all-time mention.
- **Amazon Redshift:** Integrations and easy integrations are cited in 5 and 4 all-time mentions respectively, with frequent references to integration with AWS services and third-party analytics tools like PowerBI and Tableau.

### How do Microsoft and Amazon Redshift compare on customer support?

Microsoft and Amazon Redshift are rated nearly equally on Quality of Support, with Microsoft at 8.8 and Amazon Redshift at 8.5, a difference below the materiality threshold.

- **Microsoft:** Reviewers describe support as quick, reliable, and helpful, with several recent reviews praising the support experience.
- **Amazon Redshift:** Reviewers note good support, with recent reviews mentioning helpful and responsive customer service, though some cite complexity in resolving advanced issues.

### Which is easier to implement, Microsoft or Amazon Redshift?

Amazon Redshift and Microsoft are rated within 0.2 points on Ease of Setup, indicating parity in implementation experience.

- **Microsoft:** Reviewers describe setup as straightforward, with scores of 8.4 and frequent mentions of easy installation and configuration.
- **Amazon Redshift:** Reviewers highlight ease of setup and quick start, with a score of 8.6 and multiple recent reviews noting user-friendly onboarding.

### Which product has better Cloud?

Amazon Redshift is more frequently cited for Cloud capabilities, with reviewers highlighting its cloud-native architecture and integrations.

- **Microsoft:** No all-time Cloud feature mentions; reviewers note Azure migration and cloud recovery options in recent reviews.
- **Amazon Redshift:** Cloud is the most frequently mentioned feature, with reviewers consistently citing its cloud-native design, AWS ecosystem integration, and scalability for cloud data warehousing.

## Amazon Redshift vs SQL Server 2019

When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found SQL Server 2019 easier to use. However, Amazon Redshift is easier to set up and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Amazon Redshift overall.

- Reviewers felt that SQL Server 2019 meets the needs of their business better than Amazon Redshift.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that SQL Server 2019 is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of SQL Server 2019 over Amazon Redshift.