Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Amazon Redshift and Azure Cosmos DB 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Starburst
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (42.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$1.22 - $3.26 Per hour
No pricing available
Amazon Redshift
Star Rating
(397)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$1.22 - $3.26 Per hour
Browse all 6 pricing plansAzure Cosmos DB
Star Rating
(68)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Cosmos DBSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Amazon Redshift excels in data integration with a score of 8.8, making it a preferred choice for enterprises looking to consolidate data from various sources. In contrast, Azure Cosmos DB, while versatile, received a lower score in this area, indicating potential challenges in seamless data integration.
- Reviewers mention that Amazon Redshift's built-in data analytics feature scored 8.1, which some users find beneficial for quick insights. However, Azure Cosmos DB shines with its advanced data analytics capabilities, scoring 7.4, which may appeal to users needing more sophisticated analytical tools.
- G2 users highlight that Amazon Redshift's ease of setup and administration both scored 8.6, suggesting a user-friendly experience for new users. Conversely, Azure Cosmos DB's ease of administration scored lower at 8.0, indicating that some users may face challenges in managing the database effectively.
- Reviewers mention that Amazon Redshift's data compression feature scored 8.4, which helps in optimizing storage costs. In comparison, Azure Cosmos DB's data compression capabilities are not as robust, which could lead to higher storage expenses for users with large datasets.
- Users on G2 report that Amazon Redshift's query optimization scored 6.7, which some users find lacking, especially for complex queries. Azure Cosmos DB, however, offers better query performance with a higher score, making it a more suitable option for users requiring efficient query execution.
- Reviewers say that Azure Cosmos DB's security features, including role-based authorization and encryption, scored 8.7 and 8.6 respectively, providing a strong security framework. In contrast, Amazon Redshift's security features, while decent, did not match the level of confidence users have in Azure Cosmos DB's security measures.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon Redshift
RA3.4xlarge
$1.22 - $3.26
Per hour
On-demand, 1-Year, or 3-Year Terms
- Commit to save up to 34%
Azure Cosmos DB
No pricing availableFree Trial
Amazon Redshift
Free Trial is available
Azure Cosmos DB
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
281
8.5
48
Ease of Use
8.7
281
8.2
48
Ease of Setup
8.6
138
8.0
22
Ease of Admin
8.4
128
7.7
23
Quality of Support
8.5
264
8.2
46
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
127
8.3
22
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
252
9.0
47
Features by Category
Data Management
8.8
133
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
125
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
131
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.0
127
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.6
102
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
118
|
Verified
Not enough data
Integration
7.9
101
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
128
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
119
|
Verified
Not enough data
Deployment
8.1
102
Not enough data
8.9
130
|
Verified
Not enough data
Performance
8.9
134
|
Verified
Not enough data
Security
8.7
126
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
128
|
Verified
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.3
20
Not enough data
7.2
19
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Availability
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Performance
Not enough data
6.7
6
Security
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Storage
8.4
53
Not enough data
8.4
56
Not enough data
Availability
8.6
47
Not enough data
8.2
50
Not enough data
8.4
48
Not enough data
Performance
8.2
48
Not enough data
Security
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.4
52
Not enough data
8.1
47
Not enough data
8.5
48
Not enough data
Support
7.9
43
Not enough data
8.5
47
Not enough data
Configuration
Not enough data
8.6
16
Not enough data
7.8
15
Not enough data
8.3
15
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
8.7
15
Database Administration
Not enough data
8.4
15
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
7.1
8
Availability
Not enough data
8.9
16
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
8.4
15
Not enough data
8.6
16
Security
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
5.6
6
Data Management
Not enough data
8.1
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amazon Redshift and Azure Cosmos DB are categorized as Columnar Databases
Unique Categories
Amazon Redshift is categorized as Data Warehouse and Big Data Integration Platforms
Azure Cosmos DB is categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS), Key Value Databases, Document Databases, and Graph Databases
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amazon Redshift
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Azure Cosmos DB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
15.5%
Computer Software
12.7%
Financial Services
7.7%
Retail
5.2%
Telecommunications
4.7%
Other
54.1%
Information Technology and Services
23.7%
Computer Software
20.3%
Internet
8.5%
Retail
5.1%
Gambling & Casinos
3.4%
Other
39.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Should I use with a data mart for a frontend tool that make request on it ?
3 Comments
NM
Hi Mehdi
Can you elaborate your question?
AWS Redshift is a DataBase/Data Warehouse service, which is Ideal for Analytical use cases.
You can...Read more
When can I use Amazon redshift?
3 Comments
PG
Redshift is big data warehousing solution to handle petabytes of data and also for real time decisions. If you want highly optimized data warehousing...Read more
Azure Cosmos DB has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
