Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Amazon Quantum Ledger Database (QLDB) and Google Cloud Spanner 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ER/Studio
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (66.7% of reviews)
Enterprise (43.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Amazon Quantum Ledger Database (QLDB)
Star Rating
(13)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (66.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Amazon Quantum Ledger Database (QLDB)Google Cloud Spanner
Star Rating
(35)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Google Cloud SpannerSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Google Cloud Spanner excels in scalability with a score of 9.2, making it a preferred choice for enterprises needing to handle large volumes of transactions. In contrast, Amazon QLDB, while still capable, has a lower scalability score of 8.8, which may be a consideration for rapidly growing businesses.
- Reviewers mention that Google Cloud Spanner's ACID compliance is rated at 9.2, ensuring strong transactional integrity, which is crucial for applications requiring reliable data consistency. On the other hand, Amazon QLDB also offers ACID compliance but does not highlight it as a standout feature, leading to a perception that it may not be as robust in this area.
- G2 users highlight the ease of use of Amazon QLDB, scoring it at 9.6, which is significantly higher than Google Cloud Spanner's score of 8.0. This suggests that QLDB may be more user-friendly for teams without extensive database management experience.
- Reviewers say that Google Cloud Spanner shines in its data replication capabilities, scoring 9.2, which is essential for maintaining data availability across multiple regions. In contrast, Amazon QLDB's replication features are not as prominently mentioned, indicating a potential gap in this critical area.
- Users on G2 report that Google Cloud Spanner's storage capabilities are rated at 9.5, making it a strong option for applications that require extensive data storage solutions. Meanwhile, Amazon QLDB, while functional, does not receive the same level of praise for its storage features, which could impact users with large data needs.
- Users report that Amazon QLDB's support quality is rated at 9.2, which is higher than Google Cloud Spanner's score of 8.4. This suggests that QLDB may provide more responsive and effective customer support, a critical factor for businesses that rely on timely assistance.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon Quantum Ledger Database (QLDB)
No pricing availableGoogle Cloud Spanner
No pricing availableFree Trial
Amazon Quantum Ledger Database (QLDB)
No trial information availableGoogle Cloud Spanner
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
7
8.7
24
Ease of Use
9.5
7
7.8
24
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.2
10
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.7
9
Quality of Support
9.0
7
8.6
20
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.3
10
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
7
8.4
22
Features by Category
Management
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Support
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.6
6
Security
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Performance
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
8.7
5
Database Features
Not enough data
9.5
13
Not enough data
8.6
13
Not enough data
9.0
13
Not enough data
9.2
13
Not enough data
8.9
12
Not enough data
8.3
13
Not enough data
8.6
13
Configuration
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Database Administration
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
6.3
10
Not enough data
7.0
10
Availability
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
6.7
9
Not enough data
7.0
10
Not enough data
8.1
9
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amazon Quantum Ledger Database (QLDB) and Google Cloud Spanner are categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Unique Categories
Amazon Quantum Ledger Database (QLDB) has no unique categories
Google Cloud Spanner is categorized as Relational Databases
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amazon Quantum Ledger Database (QLDB)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Google Cloud Spanner
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Business Supplies and Equipment
25.0%
Computer Software
16.7%
Pharmaceuticals
8.3%
Information Technology and Services
8.3%
Import and Export
8.3%
Other
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Computer Software
16.7%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
6.7%
Biotechnology
6.7%
Sports
3.3%
Other
46.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
Amazon Quantum Ledger Database (QLDB) has no discussions with answers
Google Cloud Spanner has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
