Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Amazon FSx and Azure NetApp Files 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Tresorit
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (53.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (70.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
64MB / second throughput per provisioned TB
Amazon FSx
Star Rating
(16)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (53.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Amazon FSxAzure NetApp Files
Star Rating
(13)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (70.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
64MB / second throughput per provisioned TB
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Azure NetApp Files excels in storage scaling with a score of 9.5, allowing for seamless adjustments to storage needs as business demands change, while Amazon FSx has not been rated in this area, indicating a potential gap in flexibility for users.
- Reviewers mention that Azure NetApp Files offers robust backup support with a score of 8.6, which is crucial for enterprise users needing reliable data recovery options, whereas Amazon FSx's backup capabilities are less highlighted, suggesting it may not meet the same level of enterprise expectations.
- G2 users highlight Azure NetApp Files' file security features, scoring 8.9, which include advanced encryption and access controls, while Amazon FSx, although secure, does not receive the same level of praise for its security measures, indicating a potential risk for sensitive data.
- Users on G2 report that Azure NetApp Files provides superior cloud migration support with a score of 8.2, making it easier for enterprises to transition to the cloud, while Amazon FSx's migration support is less emphasized, which could pose challenges for businesses looking to migrate efficiently.
- Reviewers mention that Azure NetApp Files shines in intelligent data management with a score of 8.3, offering features that optimize data usage and storage efficiency, while Amazon FSx lacks specific mentions of such advanced data management capabilities, which could impact operational efficiency.
- Users say that Azure NetApp Files has a more favorable product direction with positive feedback, while Amazon FSx has a perfect score of 10.0 in this area, indicating that users feel confident in the future development and support of Amazon FSx, which may be a deciding factor for long-term investments.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon FSx
No pricing availableAzure NetApp Files
Premium
64MB / second throughput per provisioned TB
Choose the performance level that best fits your application requirements and adjust on-the-fly without having to move data.
Free Trial
Amazon FSx
No trial information availableAzure NetApp Files
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
14
8.3
6
Ease of Use
9.2
14
8.6
6
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.6
14
8.9
6
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
14
7.7
5
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Cloud Migration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.5
13
Not enough data
8.6
13
Not enough data
8.9
12
Not enough data
8.2
12
Not enough data
Cloud Support
8.1
12
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
8.2
12
Not enough data
Automation
8.3
13
Not enough data
8.8
13
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amazon FSx and Azure NetApp Files are categorized as Cloud File Storage
Unique Categories
Amazon FSx has no unique categories
Azure NetApp Files is categorized as Cloud Migration
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amazon FSx
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Azure NetApp Files
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
33.3%
Pharmaceuticals
20.0%
Computer Software
13.3%
Telecommunications
6.7%
Financial Services
6.7%
Other
20.0%
Information Technology and Services
50.0%
Oil & Energy
10.0%
Media Production
10.0%
Food & Beverages
10.0%
Computer Software
10.0%
Other
10.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Amazon FSx has no discussions with answers
Azure NetApp Files has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
