Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) and LucidLink 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Tresorit
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Air
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (68.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$7.00 1 member Per Month
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
Star Rating
(70)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)LucidLink
Star Rating
(533)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (68.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$7.00 1 member Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Amazon EFS excels in storage scaling with a score of 9.8, making it ideal for businesses that anticipate rapid growth and need flexible storage solutions. In contrast, LucidLink, while still strong, scores a 9.0 in this area, which may be a consideration for users with fluctuating storage needs.
- Reviewers mention that Amazon EFS offers superior backup support with a score of 9.7, ensuring that data is consistently protected. LucidLink, with a score of 8.5, may not provide the same level of assurance for users who prioritize data backup and recovery.
- G2 users highlight Amazon EFS's robust file security features, scoring 9.6, which is crucial for organizations handling sensitive data. LucidLink's score of 8.7 indicates it has solid security measures, but it may not meet the stringent requirements of all users.
- Users on G2 appreciate Amazon EFS for its file organization capabilities, scoring 9.5, which helps teams manage their files efficiently. LucidLink, with a score of 9.0, offers good organization features but may lack some advanced functionalities that EFS provides.
- Reviewers mention that Amazon EFS has a more user-friendly web interface with a score of 7.5, although it could be improved. LucidLink's interface is noted for being intuitive, but it scores lower in this area, which could affect user experience.
- Users report that Amazon EFS has a higher cloud migration support score of 9.5, making it easier for businesses to transition to cloud storage. LucidLink, with a score of 8.4, may present challenges for users looking to migrate their data seamlessly.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
No pricing availableLucidLink
Starter
$7.00
1 member Per Month
Effortless file collaboration for small projects and teams getting started.
- 100GB of shared storage is included per user
- Unlimited upload speed
- Up to 10 members
Free Trial
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
No trial information availableLucidLink
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
39
8.9
461
Ease of Use
9.0
40
8.8
467
Ease of Setup
8.6
21
8.2
393
Ease of Admin
8.4
20
8.7
235
Quality of Support
9.2
32
8.8
392
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
20
9.0
234
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
36
9.4
457
Features by Category
File Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.1
350
Not enough data
8.3
339
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Cloud Content Collaboration
Not enough data
6.3
53
Not enough data
7.5
51
Not enough data
6.8
51
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.0
332
Not enough data
8.7
346
Not enough data
8.4
342
Not enough data
7.5
327
Administration
Not enough data
8.5
343
Not enough data
8.3
336
Not enough data
7.9
332
Not enough data
8.1
340
Not enough data
8.0
331
Not enough data
8.6
339
Platform
Not enough data
8.6
322
Not enough data
7.4
299
Not enough data
7.2
291
Not enough data
6.9
290
Functionality
9.8
15
8.9
253
9.7
15
8.5
250
9.6
14
8.6
253
9.5
14
8.9
257
Cloud Support
9.0
13
8.2
251
9.3
15
8.2
248
9.5
13
8.0
243
Automation
8.8
10
7.6
234
8.8
11
7.6
233
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) and LucidLink are categorized as Cloud File Storage
Unique Categories
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) has no unique categories
LucidLink is categorized as Cloud Content Collaboration
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
LucidLink
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Computer Software
18.0%
Non-Profit Organization Management
6.0%
Internet
6.0%
Telecommunications
4.0%
Other
46.0%
Media Production
22.4%
Marketing and Advertising
18.7%
Motion Pictures and Film
9.2%
Broadcast Media
7.8%
Information Technology and Services
4.0%
Other
37.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) has no discussions with answers
LucidLink has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
