Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) and Google Cloud Resource Manager

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
Star Rating
(70)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
Google Cloud Resource Manager
Google Cloud Resource Manager
Star Rating
(28)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Google Cloud Resource Manager
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Amazon EFS excels in storage scaling with a score of 9.8, allowing for seamless expansion as data needs grow, while Google Cloud Resource Manager does not focus on storage scaling, which may limit its effectiveness for users with large data requirements.
  • Reviewers mention that Amazon EFS offers robust backup support with a score of 9.7, providing users with peace of mind regarding data recovery, whereas Google Cloud Resource Manager lacks specific backup features, which could be a drawback for users prioritizing data safety.
  • G2 users highlight Amazon EFS's file security features, scoring 9.6, which include encryption and access controls, making it a preferred choice for organizations with stringent security needs, while Google Cloud Resource Manager's security features are less emphasized, potentially leaving users wanting more in this area.
  • Users on G2 appreciate Amazon EFS's file organization capabilities, scoring 9.5, which facilitate easy management of files and directories, whereas Google Cloud Resource Manager does not provide the same level of file organization, which could hinder user experience for those managing extensive file systems.
  • Reviewers mention that Amazon EFS has a higher quality of support, scoring 9.1, with many users praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, while Google Cloud Resource Manager's support is rated lower at 8.5, indicating potential challenges for users needing assistance.
  • Users say that Amazon EFS's product direction is viewed positively at 9.4, suggesting a strong commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates, while Google Cloud Resource Manager's lower score of 8.3 may indicate less confidence in its future development, which could be a concern for long-term users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
No pricing available
Google Cloud Resource Manager
No pricing available
Free Trial
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
No trial information available
Google Cloud Resource Manager
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
39
9.0
19
Ease of Use
9.0
40
8.3
19
Ease of Setup
8.6
21
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.4
20
Not enough data
Quality of Support
9.2
32
8.4
17
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
20
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
36
8.1
18
Features by Category
9.3
19
Not enough data
Functionality
9.8
15
Not enough data
9.7
15
Not enough data
9.6
14
Not enough data
9.5
14
Not enough data
Cloud Support
9.0
13
Not enough data
9.3
15
Not enough data
9.5
13
Not enough data
Automation
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
Google Cloud Resource Manager
Google Cloud Resource Manager
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) and Google Cloud Resource Manager are categorized as Cloud File Storage
Unique Categories
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) has no unique categories
Google Cloud Resource Manager
Google Cloud Resource Manager has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
30.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
32.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
38.0%
Google Cloud Resource Manager
Google Cloud Resource Manager
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
50.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
26.9%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
23.1%
Reviewers' Industry
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Computer Software
18.0%
Non-Profit Organization Management
6.0%
Internet
6.0%
Telecommunications
4.0%
Other
46.0%
Google Cloud Resource Manager
Google Cloud Resource Manager
Information Technology and Services
11.5%
Research
7.7%
Publishing
7.7%
Marketing and Advertising
7.7%
Insurance
7.7%
Other
57.7%
Alternatives
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) Alternatives
Azure Files
Azure Files
Add Azure Files
Google Cloud Filestore
Google Cloud Filestore
Add Google Cloud Filestore
Cyberduck
Cyberduck
Add Cyberduck
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Storage Gateway
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Storage Gateway
Add Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Storage Gateway
Google Cloud Resource Manager
Google Cloud Resource Manager Alternatives
SuiteDash
SuiteDash
Add SuiteDash
LucidLink
LucidLink
Add LucidLink
Veeam Data Platform
Veeam Data Platform
Add Veeam Data Platform
Assembly
Assembly
Add Assembly
Discussions
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) has no discussions with answers
Google Cloud Resource Manager
Google Cloud Resource Manager Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Google Cloud Resource Manager has no discussions with answers