Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) vs Cyberduck
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) easier to use and do business with overall. However, reviewers preferred the ease of set up with Cyberduck, along with administration.
Reviewers felt that Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) meets the needs of their business better than Cyberduck.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) over Cyberduck.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
No pricing available
Cyberduck
No pricing available
Free Trial
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
No trial information available
Cyberduck
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
39
8.9
67
Ease of Use
9.0
40
8.9
67
Ease of Setup
8.6
21
9.0
17
Ease of Admin
8.4
20
8.8
13
Quality of Support
9.2
32
7.6
32
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.