Users report that Amazon EFS excels in storage scaling with a score of 9.8, allowing for seamless expansion as data needs grow, while Azure NetApp Files, although robust, does not match this level of flexibility.
Reviewers mention that Amazon EFS offers superior backup support with a score of 9.7, highlighting its efficient snapshot capabilities, whereas Azure NetApp Files has received mixed feedback on its backup features, with some users finding them less intuitive.
G2 users indicate that Amazon EFS shines in file security, scoring 9.6, with features like encryption at rest and in transit, while Azure NetApp Files, despite having strong security measures, has a slightly lower score and some users feel it could improve in this area.
Users on G2 report that Amazon EFS provides excellent cloud migration support with a score of 9.5, making it easier for businesses to transition to the cloud, while Azure NetApp Files has been noted for its complexity in migration processes.
Reviewers mention that Amazon EFS has a user-friendly interface, contributing to its ease of use score of 9.0, while Azure NetApp Files, with a score of 8.3, has been described as having a steeper learning curve by some users.
Users say that Amazon EFS has a strong quality of support, scoring 9.1, with many praising the responsiveness of the support team, whereas Azure NetApp Files, with a score of 8.7, has received feedback indicating that support could be more accessible at times.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
No pricing available
Azure NetApp Files
Premium
64MB / second throughput per provisioned TB
Choose the performance level that best fits your application requirements and adjust on-the-fly without having to move data.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.