Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) vs Kubernetes
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers preferred doing business with Kubernetes overall.
Reviewers felt that Kubernetes meets the needs of their business better than Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS).
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Kubernetes is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Kubernetes over Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS).
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
No pricing available
Kubernetes
No pricing available
Free Trial
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
No trial information available
Kubernetes
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
204
9.2
127
Ease of Use
8.1
204
7.9
135
Ease of Setup
8.1
120
7.4
89
Ease of Admin
8.2
114
8.0
71
Quality of Support
8.3
189
8.5
109
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Discussions
Simpler
1 Comment
SP
ECS (containers) service page itself has main metrics link CPU utilization and memory utilization reports. If you need more stats you can go to cloudwatch...Read more
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) has no more discussions with answers
Container orchestration and container management.
You can also configure properties on the basis of which scaling of pods will be done.
It makes your...Read more
What are the main features of Kubernetes?
1 Comment
YA
- Container orchestration utilising available hardware or VMs, thus decreasing costs
- High Availability within a data center / availability zone
- Ability...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.