Users report that Amazon CloudFront excels in static content caching with a score of 9.1, which reviewers mention significantly improves load times for websites, while StackPath CDN, with a score of 8.6, is noted for its effective caching but does not match the performance of CloudFront.
Reviewers mention that Amazon CloudFront's SSL support is robust, scoring 9.1, which users say provides peace of mind for secure transactions, whereas StackPath CDN, with a score of 8.6, offers solid SSL capabilities but lacks some advanced features that CloudFront provides.
G2 users highlight that the API integration of Amazon CloudFront scores 8.7, making it easier for developers to implement and customize, while StackPath CDN's API, scoring 7.7, is functional but has been described as less intuitive by some users.
Users on G2 report that the dashboard of StackPath CDN, scoring 8.3, is more user-friendly and visually appealing compared to Amazon CloudFront's dashboard, which scores 7.9 and is considered less intuitive by some reviewers.
Reviewers mention that Amazon CloudFront's dynamic content routing, with a score of 8.6, is highly effective for applications requiring real-time data, while StackPath CDN's score of 8.4 indicates it performs well but may not be as optimized for dynamic content as CloudFront.
Users say that the overall ease of use for StackPath CDN, scoring 8.7, is a strong point, making it a preferred choice for small businesses, while Amazon CloudFront, with a score of 8.0, is seen as slightly more complex, which may require a steeper learning curve for new users.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.