Compare Amazon Aurora and CockroachDB 
Amazon Aurora vs CockroachDB
- Users report that Amazon Aurora excels in scalability with a score of 9.0, allowing businesses to easily adjust their database resources as needed, while CockroachDB, although strong with a score of 8.9, is noted to have slightly less flexibility in scaling.
- Reviewers mention that Amazon Aurora's backup and recovery features are highly rated at 9.1, providing robust options for data protection, whereas CockroachDB's score of 8.9 indicates solid performance but with fewer user-friendly options.
- G2 users highlight that Amazon Aurora's quality of support is rated at 8.7, with many praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, while CockroachDB's support is rated slightly higher at 9.0, indicating a strong commitment to customer service.
- Users on G2 report that Amazon Aurora's data replication capabilities are rated at 8.9, which is effective for maintaining data consistency across multiple instances, while CockroachDB shines with a score of 9.3, emphasizing its strong multi-region replication features.
- Reviewers say that Amazon Aurora's application performance is rated at 8.9, with users appreciating its speed and efficiency, while CockroachDB's score of 7.8 suggests that some users experience performance lags under heavy workloads.
- Users report that both products have similar scores for query language at 8.6, but reviewers mention that Amazon Aurora's SQL compatibility is often seen as more intuitive, making it easier for teams to adopt and utilize effectively compared to CockroachDB.
auto-everything, 1-click, faster, and cheaper!!! I mean really....compare to 10 years ago - SqlServer & Oracle dominating, taking $$$$, people to manage everything, nobody really with good DR/BU (esoteric, hard work)....or of course MySql and Postgres but...
Although the aurora is cheaper and good by the competition but still I can't personaly afford it.
CockroachDB is the only database we could find that had a truly global architecture. CockroachDB speaks PostgreSQL, so it was very easy to integrate with our existing systems.
Missing capabilities to create SQL functions. They a very handy to manage complex relationships or to manipulate large data sets - instead of having to pull them in the application layer.
auto-everything, 1-click, faster, and cheaper!!! I mean really....compare to 10 years ago - SqlServer & Oracle dominating, taking $$$$, people to manage everything, nobody really with good DR/BU (esoteric, hard work)....or of course MySql and Postgres but...
CockroachDB is the only database we could find that had a truly global architecture. CockroachDB speaks PostgreSQL, so it was very easy to integrate with our existing systems.
Although the aurora is cheaper and good by the competition but still I can't personaly afford it.
Missing capabilities to create SQL functions. They a very handy to manage complex relationships or to manipulate large data sets - instead of having to pull them in the application layer.
