Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Amazon Aurora and Azure Cosmos DB 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Dragonfly
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CockroachDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (38.8% of reviews)
Enterprise (42.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Amazon Aurora
Star Rating
(454)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (38.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Amazon AuroraAzure Cosmos DB
Star Rating
(68)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Cosmos DBSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Amazon Aurora excels in scalability, with a score of 9.0, allowing businesses to handle increased workloads seamlessly, while Azure Cosmos DB follows closely with a score of 8.9, indicating strong performance but slightly less flexibility in scaling.
- Reviewers mention that Amazon Aurora's data replication feature is highly rated at 8.9, ensuring data consistency and availability, whereas Azure Cosmos DB's replication score of 8.1 suggests room for improvement in this critical area.
- G2 users highlight Amazon Aurora's backup capabilities, scoring 9.1, which provides robust data protection, while Azure Cosmos DB's backup score of 8.3 indicates a less comprehensive approach to data recovery.
- Users on G2 appreciate Amazon Aurora's query language support, scoring 8.6, which facilitates complex queries efficiently, compared to Azure Cosmos DB's score of 7.9, where users feel the query capabilities could be enhanced.
- Reviewers say that Amazon Aurora's ease of use is a standout feature with a score of 8.7, making it accessible for small businesses, while Azure Cosmos DB, with a score of 8.6, is also user-friendly but may require a steeper learning curve for some users.
- Users report that Amazon Aurora's quality of support is commendable, scoring 8.7, which is slightly higher than Azure Cosmos DB's 8.6, indicating that Aurora may provide a more responsive support experience based on user feedback.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon Aurora
No pricing availableAzure Cosmos DB
No pricing availableFree Trial
Amazon Aurora
No trial information availableAzure Cosmos DB
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
407
8.5
48
Ease of Use
8.7
409
8.2
48
Ease of Setup
8.6
256
8.0
22
Ease of Admin
8.7
179
7.7
23
Quality of Support
8.7
393
8.2
46
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
176
8.3
22
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
393
9.0
47
Features by Category
Management
8.7
210
Not enough data
8.6
211
Not enough data
8.8
209
Not enough data
8.9
212
Not enough data
Support
8.4
208
Not enough data
8.6
215
Not enough data
8.4
207
Not enough data
8.6
205
Not enough data
Security
8.7
204
Not enough data
8.7
206
Not enough data
8.9
207
Not enough data
8.8
205
Not enough data
Performance
8.9
208
Not enough data
8.8
205
Not enough data
8.8
204
Not enough data
8.6
203
Not enough data
8.5
203
Not enough data
Database Features
9.1
295
Not enough data
9.2
293
Not enough data
8.9
292
Not enough data
9.2
287
Not enough data
9.0
287
Not enough data
8.5
284
Not enough data
8.6
291
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Availability
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Performance
Not enough data
6.7
6
Security
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Storage
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Configuration
8.9
205
8.6
16
8.6
192
7.8
15
8.6
202
8.3
15
8.3
183
7.2
9
8.8
199
8.7
15
Database Administration
8.7
197
8.4
15
8.6
182
7.6
9
8.5
182
7.1
8
Availability
9.0
198
8.9
16
9.1
196
8.3
16
8.8
189
8.4
15
8.7
189
8.6
16
Security
8.7
134
7.2
6
8.6
134
7.2
6
8.6
127
5.6
6
Data Management
8.9
135
8.1
7
8.5
126
7.4
7
Database Features
9.1
295
Not enough data
9.2
293
Not enough data
8.9
292
Not enough data
9.2
287
Not enough data
9.0
287
Not enough data
8.5
284
Not enough data
8.6
291
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amazon Aurora and Azure Cosmos DB are categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Unique Categories
Amazon Aurora is categorized as Relational Databases
Azure Cosmos DB is categorized as Key Value Databases, Document Databases, Graph Databases, and Columnar Databases
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amazon Aurora
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Azure Cosmos DB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
22.8%
Computer Software
21.4%
Computer & Network Security
4.9%
Financial Services
4.2%
Education Management
3.7%
Other
43.0%
Information Technology and Services
23.7%
Computer Software
20.3%
Internet
8.5%
Retail
5.1%
Gambling & Casinos
3.4%
Other
39.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Amazon Aurora vs RDS?
2 Comments
AR
AWS (Amazon Web Services) offers both Amazon Aurora and Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) as database services, however, they have slightly different...Read more
What is Amazon Aurora used for?
2 Comments
HA
Amazon Aurora is a fully managed relational database engine designed for the cloud, compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL. It's used for providing high...Read more
Amazon Aurora has no more discussions with answers
Azure Cosmos DB has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
