Users report that AlphaSense excels in document search with a score of 9.3, making it easier to find relevant information quickly, while FactSet Data Feeds, with a score of 8.9, offers solid performance but lacks the same level of efficiency.
Reviewers mention that AlphaSense's data visualization capabilities are rated lower at 7.2 compared to FactSet Data Feeds' 7.8, indicating that users may find FactSet's visual representation of data more intuitive and user-friendly.
G2 users highlight AlphaSense's superior quality of support with a score of 9.4, which is significantly higher than FactSet Data Feeds' 7.8, suggesting that users feel more supported and valued when using AlphaSense.
Users on G2 report that AlphaSense's ease of use is rated at 8.7, while FactSet Data Feeds falls behind at 7.0, indicating that AlphaSense may provide a more user-friendly interface and experience overall.
Reviewers mention that AlphaSense's product direction is rated highly at 9.3, reflecting a positive outlook on future updates and features, whereas FactSet Data Feeds has a concerning score of 3.5, suggesting potential stagnation in development.
Users say that AlphaSense's file management features, particularly in file sharing and simultaneous editing, are rated well, indicating a collaborative advantage over FactSet Data Feeds, which lacks similar robust features.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AlphaSense
SMB-MM
Seat-based
For small and medium sized teams, we offer seat-based pricing.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.