Link copied to clipboard # Alacritty vs Tabby.sh Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/alacritty/tabby-sh/export.csv) AlacrittyTabby.sh[+ Add Product](#) Pricing **Alacritty** No pricing available **Tabby.sh** No pricing available **Pros & Cons** from reviews **Alacritty** Not enough data **Tabby.sh** Not enough data **Ratings** from reviews Meets Requirements **Alacritty** **8.7** /10 Based on 9 responses **Tabby.sh** **9.0** /10 Based on 5 responses Ease of Use **Alacritty** **8.9** /10 Based on 9 responses **Tabby.sh** **8.3** /10 Based on 5 responses Ease of Setup **Alacritty** Not enough data **Tabby.sh** Not enough data Ease of Admin **Alacritty** Not enough data **Tabby.sh** Not enough data Quality of Support **Alacritty** **8.1** /10 Based on 7 responses **Tabby.sh** **7.3** /10 Based on 5 responses Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **Alacritty** Not enough data **Tabby.sh** Not enough data Product Direction (% positive) **Alacritty** **10.0** /10 Based on 9 responses **Tabby.sh** Not enough data **Features** ratings from reviews Terminal Emulator **8.8** /10 Based on 8 responses Not enough data User Insights **Reviewers' Company Size** Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 50.0% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 33.3% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 16.7% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 50.0% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 33.3% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 16.7% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 62.5% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 37.5% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 0% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 62.5% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 37.5% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 0% **Reviewers' Industry** [![Alacritty](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_8ec3c17e3fb1df25b6a8bd7cc69cf2d1/alacritty.png "Alacritty")](https://www.g2.com/products/alacritty/reviews) Alacritty Program Development 16.7% Retail 8.3% Primary/Secondary Education 8.3% Information Technology and Services 8.3% Food & Beverages 8.3% Other 50.0% [![Tabby.sh](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_8ec3c17e3fb1df25b6a8bd7cc69cf2d1/tabby-sh.png "Tabby.sh")](https://www.g2.com/products/tabby-sh/reviews) Tabby.sh Computer Software 37.5% Information Technology and Services 31.3% Wholesale 6.3% Retail 6.3% Logistics and Supply Chain 6.3% Other 12.5% Alternatives **Alacritty Alternatives** ![iTerm2](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_0159d1abdafe291500d48ac376a5d2c4/iterm2.jpg "iTerm2") [ iTerm2 ](/products/iterm2/reviews) ![GNOME Terminal](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_4a102060ec244b2088e01a39dde8ed6d/gnome-terminal.jpg "GNOME Terminal") [ GNOME Terminal ](/products/gnome-terminal/reviews) ![PuTTY](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_91ba385b963fa00bce23b532cca3ebba/putty.png "PuTTY") [ PuTTY ](/products/putty/reviews) ![MobaXTerm](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_3c47b0293b63e905b726b84b02ab0683/mobaxterm.PNG "MobaXTerm") [ MobaXTerm ](/products/mobaxterm/reviews) **Tabby.sh Alternatives** ![iTerm2](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_0159d1abdafe291500d48ac376a5d2c4/iterm2.jpg "iTerm2") [ iTerm2 ](/products/iterm2/reviews) ![PuTTY](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_91ba385b963fa00bce23b532cca3ebba/putty.png "PuTTY") [ PuTTY ](/products/putty/reviews) ![MobaXTerm](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_3c47b0293b63e905b726b84b02ab0683/mobaxterm.PNG "MobaXTerm") [ MobaXTerm ](/products/mobaxterm/reviews) ![SecureCRT](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_7480f3088d28dac2e53abe007c765c98/securecrt.png "SecureCRT") [ SecureCRT ](/products/securecrt/reviews) ## Alacritty vs Tabby.sh FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 15, 2026 ### What is the difference between Tabby.sh vs Alacritty? Alacritty is rated slightly higher than Tabby.sh by G2 reviewers, with Alacritty's headline strength being its speed and performance, while Tabby.sh is praised for its customization and modern UI. | | [Tabby.sh](https://www.g2.com/products/tabby-sh/reviews) | [Alacritty](https://www.g2.com/products/alacritty/reviews) | | --- | --- | --- | | G2 Rating (reviews) | 4.2/5 (16 reviews) | 4.3/5 (12 reviews) | | Ease of Setup score | 6.5 | 6.5 | | Quality of Support score | 7.3 | 8.1 | | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | Highly customizable interface and modern look | Fast performance and GPU acceleration | ### How do the pricing models of Tabby.sh and Alacritty compare? Alacritty is considered the stronger value by reviewers, as reflected in higher satisfaction scores related to price and cost. - **Tabby.sh:** Reviewers appreciate that Tabby.sh is open source and free, with many highlighting its extensive customization and plugin support as strong value drivers. - **Alacritty:** Reviewers consistently mention Alacritty's open source nature and high performance as delivering excellent value, with no significant cost-related complaints in recent reviews. ### What are the best alternatives to Tabby.sh and Alacritty? The top 3 alternatives to Tabby.sh and Alacritty are iTerm2, MobaXTerm, and GNOME Terminal. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [Tabby.sh](https://www.g2.com/products/tabby-sh/reviews) | 4.2/5 (16 reviews) | — | Open source and free | Highly customizable interface and modern look | | [Alacritty](https://www.g2.com/products/alacritty/reviews) | 4.3/5 (12 reviews) | — | Open source and free | Fast performance and GPU acceleration | | [iTerm2](https://www.g2.com/products/iterm2/reviews) | 4.7/5 (51 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | Advanced features and reliability | | [MobaXTerm](https://www.g2.com/products/mobaxterm/reviews) | 4.6/5 (110 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | Comprehensive remote access tools | | [GNOME Terminal](https://www.g2.com/products/gnome-terminal/reviews) | 4.5/5 (14 reviews) | — | — | Stable and user-friendly for Linux environments | ### Which Terminal Emulator features should I prioritize when comparing Tabby.sh and Alacritty? Buyers should prioritize customization, performance, cross-platform support, session management, and plugin/theme support when comparing Tabby.sh and Alacritty. - **Customization:** Tabby.sh is frequently praised for its highly customizable interface, including themes, hotkeys, and CSS editing, while Alacritty also supports configuration but with less emphasis on UI customization. - **Performance:** Alacritty is consistently highlighted for its fast performance and GPU acceleration, with reviewers noting its unmatched speed. - **Cross-platform support:** Both products are noted for cross-platform compatibility, but Tabby.sh reviewers specifically mention consistent experiences across Windows, Linux, and Mac. - **Session management:** Tabby.sh is cited for saving SSH sessions and supporting multiple tabs, while Alacritty lacks native tab and split support. - **Plugin and theme support:** Tabby.sh offers extensive plugin and theme options, which are frequently mentioned as a differentiator. ### What are the pros and cons of Tabby.sh vs Alacritty? Tabby.sh's headline strength is its extensive customization and modern UI, while Alacritty's is its speed and performance. - **Tabby.sh strengths:** Highly customizable interface, modern look, cross-platform support, integrated SSH/SFTP, plugin and theme support, session management, and user-friendly experience. - **Tabby.sh trade-offs:** Occasional connectivity issues, resource usage due to Electron, occasional stability issues, and input lag reported by some reviewers. - **Alacritty strengths:** Fast performance, GPU acceleration, open source, easy configuration, and strong cross-platform support. - **Alacritty trade-offs:** Lacks native tab and split support, configuration errors can cause crashes, and some reviewers desire more advanced UI features. ### Is Tabby.sh or Alacritty better for small businesses? Tabby.sh is better suited for small businesses, as recent reviews highlight its ease of use and customization for teams. - **Tabby.sh:** While no explicit segment share is provided, reviewers from small business contexts praise its SSH management, cross-platform support, and user-friendly customization. - **Alacritty:** No explicit small-business segment share is available, and reviewers focus more on individual performance and configuration rather than team or business use cases. ### Which Terminal Emulator platform has better integrations? Tabby.sh and Alacritty are at parity for integrations, as neither product has reviewer-cited integrations in recent reviews. - **Tabby.sh:** No integrations are mentioned in recent reviews. - **Alacritty:** No integrations are mentioned in recent reviews. ### How do Tabby.sh and Alacritty compare on customer support? Alacritty has a higher Quality of Support score than Tabby.sh by 0.8 points, indicating a material advantage in reviewer satisfaction with support. - **Tabby.sh:** Reviewers describe support as generally responsive, with some noting frequent updates and helpful documentation, but a few mention slower responses and occasional issues with new features. - **Alacritty:** Reviewers consistently rate support highly, citing a responsive community and active development, with minimal complaints about support experiences. ### Which is easier to implement, Tabby.sh or Alacritty? Tabby.sh and Alacritty are at parity on Ease of Setup, both scoring 6.5, with reviewers describing straightforward implementation for each. - **Tabby.sh:** Reviewers highlight easy installation and setup, with some mentioning quick onboarding and simple configuration for SSH and plugins. - **Alacritty:** Reviewers note fast and simple setup, with configuration files being easy to manage, though a few mention initial complexity for advanced customization.