Users report that GNOME Terminal excels in its ease of use with a score of 9.2, making it a preferred choice for beginners, while Alacritty, with a score of 8.9, is noted for its steeper learning curve due to its reliance on configuration files.
Reviewers mention that GNOME Terminal offers superior quality of support, scoring 9.5, which is significantly higher than Alacritty's 8.1, indicating that users may find more assistance and resources when using GNOME Terminal.
G2 users highlight Alacritty's performance in resource usage, scoring 9.0, which is impressive for a terminal emulator, while GNOME Terminal scores 9.5, showing that both products are efficient but GNOME Terminal has a slight edge.
Users on G2 appreciate Alacritty's customization capabilities, scoring 9.5, allowing for extensive personalization of the terminal experience, whereas GNOME Terminal, with a score of 8.9, offers fewer customization options.
Reviewers mention that GNOME Terminal has a better command-line interface experience, scoring 8.8, while Alacritty scores 9.0, indicating that both are strong but Alacritty may offer a more responsive experience for advanced users.
Users say that Alacritty shines in its plugin support, scoring 9.3, which allows for enhanced functionality, while GNOME Terminal's plugin support is rated lower at 8.5, suggesting that users looking for extensibility may prefer Alacritty.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Alacritty
No pricing available
GNOME Terminal
No pricing available
Free Trial
Alacritty
No trial information available
GNOME Terminal
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
9
9.7
12
Ease of Use
8.9
9
9.2
12
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
7
9.5
10
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.