Users report that ConEmu excels in its customization options, allowing for extensive personalization of the user interface, while Alacritty, although customizable, is noted for its simpler configuration process.
Reviewers mention that ConEmu has a higher quality of support rating (8.8) compared to Alacritty (8.1), indicating that users may find more responsive assistance when using ConEmu.
G2 users highlight that ConEmu's plugin support is robust, with a rating of 9.3, making it a preferred choice for those who rely on additional functionalities, whereas Alacritty's plugin capabilities are less emphasized.
Users on G2 report that ConEmu's Windows support is rated significantly higher (9.7) than Alacritty's (8.1), making it a better option for users primarily on Windows systems.
Reviewers say that both products perform well in terms of resource usage, but ConEmu edges out with a score of 9.4 compared to Alacritty's 9.0, suggesting it may be slightly more efficient in resource management.
Users say that while both products support Linux well, ConEmu's support is rated higher (9.7) than Alacritty's (9.2), indicating a more favorable experience for Linux users with ConEmu.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Alacritty
No pricing available
ConEmu
No pricing available
Free Trial
Alacritty
No trial information available
ConEmu
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
9
9.5
11
Ease of Use
8.9
9
9.4
11
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
7
8.8
7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.