Users report that Amazon CloudFront excels in static content caching with a score of 9.1, while Akamai Site Shield shines even brighter with a score of 9.5, indicating a more robust performance in this area.
Reviewers mention that Akamai Site Shield offers superior dynamic content routing, scoring 9.4 compared to Amazon CloudFront's 8.6, which suggests that Akamai may provide a more efficient experience for dynamic content delivery.
G2 users highlight that Akamai Site Shield's cache purging feature is notably better, scoring 9.0 against Amazon CloudFront's 7.8, making it a more reliable choice for users needing timely updates to their cached content.
Users on G2 appreciate the SSL capabilities of both products, but Akamai Site Shield's custom SSL feature scores higher at 9.2 compared to Amazon CloudFront's 8.6, indicating a more flexible approach to security for users with specific needs.
Reviewers mention that Akamai Site Shield's dashboard and reporting features are more user-friendly, with scores of 8.7 and 8.6 respectively, while Amazon CloudFront's scores of 7.9 and 7.6 suggest room for improvement in usability and insights.
Users say that integration capabilities are a strong point for both products, but Akamai Site Shield's CMS integration score of 9.2 outshines Amazon CloudFront's 7.6, indicating a more seamless experience for users looking to connect their content management systems.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Akamai Site Shield
No pricing available
Amazon CloudFront
No pricing available
Free Trial
Akamai Site Shield
No trial information available
Amazon CloudFront
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
15
9.1
158
Ease of Use
8.8
15
8.0
160
Ease of Setup
9.2
12
8.0
103
Ease of Admin
9.2
12
8.0
102
Quality of Support
9.0
16
8.2
133
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.