Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Aiveo and OpenText Application Quality Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (38.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0 per month
No pricing available
Aiveo
Star Rating
(58)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (38.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
$0 per month
Browse all 4 pricing plansOpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a remarkable 9.1, which allows for comprehensive management of test cases and results. In contrast, Aiveo, while strong in other areas, does not have a specific score for this feature, indicating a potential gap in test case management capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that Aiveo shines in Ease of Setup with a score of 9.5, making it particularly appealing for small businesses looking for a quick implementation. OpenText ALM Quality Center, however, has a lower score of 7.2, suggesting that its setup process may be more complex and time-consuming.
- G2 users highlight the superior Test Diversity of OpenText ALM Quality Center, which scored 9.3, indicating a wide range of testing options. Aiveo does not provide a specific score for this feature, which may limit its appeal for teams needing varied testing methodologies.
- Users on G2 report that Aiveo offers better overall user satisfaction with a higher score of 9.0 in Ease of Use compared to OpenText ALM Quality Center's 7.8. This suggests that Aiveo may provide a more intuitive interface, making it easier for teams to adopt and utilize effectively.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText ALM Quality Center has robust Reporting capabilities, scoring 8.9, which is crucial for tracking project progress and quality metrics. Aiveo, while it has strong features, does not specifically highlight reporting in its reviews, which could be a disadvantage for data-driven teams.
- Users say that Aiveo's Quality of Support is rated at 8.6, indicating a strong customer service experience, while OpenText ALM Quality Center's support is rated lower at 7.7. This difference may influence buyer decisions, especially for teams that prioritize responsive support during implementation and ongoing use.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
Aiveo
No trial information availableOpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
52
8.2
118
Ease of Use
9.0
52
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
9.5
22
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
8.6
22
7.2
59
Quality of Support
8.6
43
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
16
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
52
6.8
116
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Automation
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Aiveo and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Bug Tracking
Unique Categories
Aiveo has no unique categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Aiveo
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Consumer Goods
21.2%
Information Technology and Services
17.3%
Computer Software
7.7%
Design
5.8%
Banking
5.8%
Other
42.3%
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Discussions
Aiveo has no discussions with answers
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
