Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Aikido Security and SOOS 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
OX Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cyclopt Companion
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (76.5% of reviews)
Mid-Market (53.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free
Aikido Security
Star Rating
(104)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (76.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 5 pricing plansSOOS
Star Rating
(42)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (53.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that SOOS excels in its Language Support with a score of 9.5, making it a preferred choice for teams working with diverse programming languages. In contrast, Aikido Security's score of 8.9 indicates it may not cater as effectively to multi-language environments.
- Reviewers mention that SOOS offers superior Automated Scans with a score of 8.8, which helps teams identify vulnerabilities quickly. Aikido Security, while still effective, has a lower score of 8.7, suggesting it may not be as efficient in this area.
- G2 users highlight SOOS's strong performance in Vulnerability Management with a score of 8.8, which is crucial for maintaining application security. Aikido Security, however, has a slightly lower score of 8.0, indicating potential gaps in its vulnerability management capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that Aikido Security shines in Quality of Support, scoring 9.6 compared to SOOS's 9.3. This suggests that users may find Aikido Security more responsive and helpful when issues arise.
- Users on G2 report that SOOS provides better Transparency with a score of 9.4, which is essential for teams needing clear insights into their security posture. Aikido Security's score of 8.9 indicates it may not offer the same level of visibility.
- Reviewers say that SOOS's Compliance Management features are robust, scoring 9.4, which is vital for organizations needing to adhere to regulations. Aikido Security's score of 8.1 suggests it may not be as comprehensive in this area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Aikido Security
Free (forever)
Free
For developers and curious minds
- Up to 2 users, 10 repos, 1 domain & 1 cloud account
- Cloud posture management (CSPM)
- Open source dependency scanning (SCA)
SOOS
SOOS Community Edition
Free
Our no-hassle enrollment process and easy-to-setup GitHub integration, brings practical supply chain security to the masses. Use our SCA tool with any public GitHub repository!
- All features of SOOS SCA
- Scan Node, Ruby, Python, Java, & more (17 pkg managers and languages)
- Robust license policies
Free Trial
Aikido Security
Free Trial is available
SOOS
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
101
8.8
29
Ease of Use
9.4
102
9.3
32
Ease of Setup
9.5
94
9.1
19
Ease of Admin
9.4
63
9.3
18
Quality of Support
9.4
84
9.3
24
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
57
9.1
17
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
101
9.6
30
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.6
56
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Analysis
8.7
54
Not enough data
8.9
54
Not enough data
9.0
54
Not enough data
8.9
53
Not enough data
Testing
7.3
42
Not enough data
7.0
41
Not enough data
8.1
43
Not enough data
8.4
44
Not enough data
8.2
42
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.6
46
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
8.3
24
Not enough data
Administration
Feature Not Available
7.4
9
Feature Not Available
8.3
7
Analysis
9.2
21
7.6
12
9.1
21
8.6
11
9.4
21
9.0
8
9.4
21
9.0
13
9.5
20
Not enough data
Testing
6.8
17
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
9.4
8
8.5
18
8.9
6
8.0
18
9.3
9
Feature Not Available
8.9
11
6.5
18
6.1
9
Administration
8.8
36
Not enough data
8.1
34
Not enough data
9.0
34
Not enough data
8.3
32
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.6
35
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Protection
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.4
33
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.6
31
Not enough data
Performance
8.7
60
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.7
58
Not enough data
8.9
59
Not enough data
Network
7.9
57
Not enough data
7.9
54
Not enough data
7.9
55
Not enough data
Application
7.2
52
Not enough data
8.8
56
Not enough data
7.9
50
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
7.8
24
Not enough data
7.6
24
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
9.0
21
9.5
10
9.0
21
9.5
17
9.0
21
9.4
14
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
9.0
21
9.0
14
9.0
21
9.3
15
9.1
21
9.1
15
Documentation
9.6
9
Not enough data
9.6
9
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
Security
7.9
12
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
8.3
10
Not enough data
Configuration
6.8
19
Not enough data
7.8
20
Not enough data
7.7
19
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
Visibility
8.6
23
Not enough data
7.9
20
Not enough data
Vulnerability Management
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
21
Not enough data
8.8
21
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
Security
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
14
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.9
15
Not enough data
Tracking
7.9
12
Not enough data
7.3
11
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
9.0
20
Not enough data
8.5
19
Not enough data
8.9
19
Not enough data
8.3
18
Not enough data
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
9.1
18
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
8.3
19
Not enough data
8.5
19
Not enough data
7.7
19
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
7.5
6
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)Hide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Artificial Intelligence - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Configuration Management - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Aikido Security and SOOS are categorized as Software Supply Chain Security Tools, Software Composition Analysis, and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Unique Categories
Aikido Security is categorized as Penetration Testing, AI AppSec Assistants, Application Security Posture Management (ASPM), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM), Container Security, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Vulnerability Scanner, Secure Code Review, and Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
SOOS is categorized as Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Aikido Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SOOS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
37.3%
Information Technology and Services
17.6%
Hospital & Health Care
6.9%
Computer & Network Security
5.9%
Retail
3.9%
Other
28.4%
Information Technology and Services
27.5%
Computer Software
20.0%
Real Estate
5.0%
Pharmaceuticals
5.0%
Logistics and Supply Chain
5.0%
Other
37.5%
Discussions
Aikido Security has no discussions with answers
SOOS has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
