Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Aikido Security and Jit 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
OX Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (76.5% of reviews)
Mid-Market (44.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
No pricing available
Aikido Security
Star Rating
(104)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (76.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 5 pricing plansJit
Star Rating
(43)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about JitSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Jit excels in its Ease of Setup with a score of 9.4, making it a preferred choice for teams looking to implement quickly, while Aikido Security also performs well with a score of 9.5, indicating a similarly user-friendly setup process.
- Reviewers mention that Aikido Security shines in Detection Rate with a score of 9.4, which is higher than Jit's score of 8.6, suggesting that Aikido may provide more effective threat detection capabilities.
- G2 users highlight Jit's superior Quality of Support with a perfect score of 9.6, indicating that users feel well-supported, whereas Aikido Security matches this score but lacks the same volume of reviews, which may affect perceived reliability.
- Users on G2 report that Aikido Security offers better Compliance Testing with a score of 9.5 compared to Jit's score of 8.2, suggesting that Aikido may be more effective for organizations focused on regulatory compliance.
- Reviewers mention that Jit has a strong performance in Automated Scans with a score of 9.0, which is beneficial for teams looking to streamline their security processes, while Aikido Security's score of 8.8 indicates a slightly less robust automated scanning feature.
- Users say that Jit's API / Integrations score of 8.5 is slightly lower than Aikido Security's score of 8.7, suggesting that Aikido may offer a more seamless integration experience with other tools, which is crucial for teams relying on multiple software solutions.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Aikido Security
Free (forever)
Free
For developers and curious minds
- Up to 2 users, 10 repos, 1 domain & 1 cloud account
- Cloud posture management (CSPM)
- Open source dependency scanning (SCA)
Jit
No pricing availableFree Trial
Aikido Security
Free Trial is available
Jit
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
101
8.9
42
Ease of Use
9.4
102
9.0
42
Ease of Setup
9.5
94
9.2
37
Ease of Admin
9.4
63
9.1
27
Quality of Support
9.4
84
9.3
42
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
57
9.6
26
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
101
9.7
43
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.6
56
8.1
22
Feature Not Available
8.0
22
Analysis
8.7
54
8.1
26
8.9
54
8.1
25
9.0
54
8.9
25
8.9
53
9.0
20
Testing
7.3
42
6.6
20
7.0
41
6.9
20
8.1
43
8.7
20
8.4
44
8.3
20
8.2
42
8.2
17
Feature Not Available
8.9
19
7.6
46
7.4
18
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
8.3
24
Not enough data
Administration
Feature Not Available
8.7
17
Feature Not Available
8.8
16
Analysis
9.2
21
8.6
16
9.1
21
8.9
15
9.4
21
9.2
16
9.4
21
9.4
16
9.5
20
9.2
14
Testing
6.8
17
7.5
14
Feature Not Available
8.5
14
8.5
18
8.8
13
8.0
18
8.5
13
Feature Not Available
9.0
14
6.5
18
7.3
14
Administration
8.8
36
Not enough data
8.1
34
Not enough data
9.0
34
Not enough data
8.3
32
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.6
35
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Protection
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.4
33
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.6
31
Not enough data
Performance
8.7
60
8.3
21
Feature Not Available
8.4
21
7.7
58
7.6
21
8.9
59
8.6
22
Network
7.9
57
8.0
21
7.9
54
7.1
21
7.9
55
8.4
22
Application
7.2
52
7.0
21
8.8
56
8.6
24
7.9
50
8.3
20
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
7.8
24
Not enough data
7.6
24
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
9.0
21
8.3
7
9.0
21
8.8
7
9.0
21
8.9
6
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
9.0
21
8.1
9
9.0
21
8.5
8
9.1
21
8.3
9
Responses
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Autonomy - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
9.6
9
8.6
23
9.6
9
8.3
23
8.3
9
8.5
24
Security
7.9
12
7.9
25
8.9
11
8.2
23
8.3
10
8.3
24
Configuration
6.8
19
Not enough data
7.8
20
Not enough data
7.7
19
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
Visibility
8.6
23
Not enough data
7.9
20
Not enough data
Vulnerability Management
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
21
Not enough data
8.8
21
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
Security
Feature Not Available
8.6
11
9.0
14
8.6
11
Feature Not Available
8.6
11
8.9
15
8.8
12
Tracking
7.9
12
8.6
11
7.3
11
8.3
11
8.5
13
8.8
12
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
9.0
20
8.5
14
8.5
19
8.5
14
8.9
19
8.2
15
8.3
18
8.1
14
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
9.1
18
8.7
15
8.9
18
8.7
15
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
8.3
19
8.1
15
8.5
19
8.6
15
7.7
19
7.8
16
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
7.5
6
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)Hide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Artificial Intelligence - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Configuration Management - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Aikido Security and Jit are categorized as Software Supply Chain Security Tools, Application Security Posture Management (ASPM), Software Composition Analysis, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Vulnerability Scanner, and Secure Code Review
Unique Categories
Aikido Security is categorized as Penetration Testing, AI AppSec Assistants, Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM), Container Security, and Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Jit is categorized as Build Automation and AI Agents For Business Operations
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Aikido Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Jit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
37.3%
Information Technology and Services
17.6%
Hospital & Health Care
6.9%
Computer & Network Security
5.9%
Retail
3.9%
Other
28.4%
Computer Software
30.2%
Financial Services
14.0%
Telecommunications
11.6%
Information Technology and Services
7.0%
Computer & Network Security
7.0%
Other
30.2%
Discussions
Aikido Security has no discussions with answers
Jit has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
