Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Aikido Security and GitLab 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
OX Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (76.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (37.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
No pricing available
Aikido Security
Star Rating
(104)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (76.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 5 pricing plansGitLab
Star Rating
(864)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitLab excels in its Static Code Analysis feature, scoring 9.1, which reviewers mention provides comprehensive insights into code quality. In contrast, Aikido Security, while still strong at 9.4, is noted for its focus on security vulnerabilities rather than general code quality.
- Reviewers mention that Aikido Security shines in Ease of Use with a score of 9.4, making it particularly appealing for small businesses. GitLab, with a score of 8.7, is still user-friendly but may require a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Users on G2 highlight Aikido Security's superior Quality of Support with a score of 9.5, indicating prompt and effective assistance. GitLab, at 8.5, has received feedback that while support is good, response times can be slower during peak hours.
- Reviewers say that GitLab's API / Integrations capabilities are robust, scoring 9.1, which allows for seamless integration with various tools. Aikido Security, with a score of 8.6, is noted for fewer integrations, which may limit flexibility for some users.
- Users report that Aikido Security's False Positives score of 6.3 is a concern, as it indicates a higher rate of incorrect alerts compared to GitLab's score of 7.9. This can lead to unnecessary alarm and wasted resources for teams relying on accurate security alerts.
- G2 users mention that GitLab's Test Automation feature, scoring 9.1, is highly praised for its efficiency in streamlining testing processes. Aikido Security, while scoring 8.0, is seen as less effective in this area, which may impact teams looking for comprehensive automation solutions.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Aikido Security
Free (forever)
Free
For developers and curious minds
- Up to 2 users, 10 repos, 1 domain & 1 cloud account
- Cloud posture management (CSPM)
- Open source dependency scanning (SCA)
GitLab
No pricing availableFree Trial
Aikido Security
Free Trial is available
GitLab
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
101
9.1
653
Ease of Use
9.4
102
8.7
655
Ease of Setup
9.5
94
8.6
216
Ease of Admin
9.4
63
8.6
172
Quality of Support
9.4
84
8.5
517
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
57
8.8
147
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
101
8.7
620
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.7
123
Not enough data
8.9
131
Not enough data
8.6
123
Functionality
Not enough data
9.0
129
Not enough data
8.5
115
Not enough data
8.5
109
Not enough data
8.7
114
Not enough data
8.6
103
Processes
Not enough data
9.1
132
Not enough data
9.0
121
Not enough data
8.7
121
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.6
56
9.2
28
Feature Not Available
9.0
27
Analysis
8.7
54
8.7
26
8.9
54
9.0
27
9.0
54
9.1
27
8.9
53
8.9
25
Testing
7.3
42
8.8
27
7.0
41
8.7
26
8.1
43
9.1
26
8.4
44
8.8
26
8.2
42
8.8
24
Feature Not Available
8.5
24
7.6
46
8.8
24
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
8.3
24
Not enough data
Administration
Feature Not Available
9.2
25
Feature Not Available
8.9
24
Analysis
9.2
21
8.5
24
9.1
21
9.2
24
9.4
21
8.8
24
9.4
21
8.9
24
9.5
20
9.0
24
Testing
6.8
17
8.6
23
Feature Not Available
9.1
23
8.5
18
8.9
22
8.0
18
9.0
21
Feature Not Available
9.0
20
6.5
18
9.1
21
Administration
8.8
36
Not enough data
8.1
34
Not enough data
9.0
34
Not enough data
8.3
32
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.6
35
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Protection
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.4
33
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.6
31
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.7
77
Not enough data
8.7
78
Not enough data
8.7
75
Not enough data
8.8
80
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
79
Not enough data
8.4
72
Not enough data
9.0
79
Not enough data
8.7
73
IT Management
Not enough data
8.7
74
Not enough data
8.9
74
Not enough data
8.6
71
Performance
8.7
60
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.7
58
Not enough data
8.9
59
Not enough data
Network
7.9
57
Not enough data
7.9
54
Not enough data
7.9
55
Not enough data
Application
7.2
52
Not enough data
8.8
56
Not enough data
7.9
50
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
7.8
24
Not enough data
7.6
24
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
212
Not enough data
9.0
214
Not enough data
8.7
205
Management
Not enough data
8.7
198
Not enough data
8.4
191
Not enough data
8.9
206
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.2
9
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.6
139
Not enough data
8.5
133
Not enough data
8.6
140
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.4
136
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.8
135
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
9.0
21
8.7
65
9.0
21
8.8
70
9.0
21
8.7
67
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
9.0
21
8.8
64
9.0
21
9.0
64
9.1
21
9.0
61
Management
Not enough data
8.8
142
Not enough data
8.8
147
Not enough data
8.5
135
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
148
Not enough data
8.8
148
Not enough data
8.7
139
Processes
Not enough data
9.0
152
Not enough data
8.5
140
Not enough data
9.0
155
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
225
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
210
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
204
|
Verified
Management
Not enough data
8.8
213
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
215
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
197
|
Verified
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
7.3
11
Not enough data
7.6
13
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
7.1
11
Not enough data
7.6
11
Documentation
9.6
9
8.8
116
9.6
9
8.6
112
8.3
9
8.4
112
Security
7.9
12
8.0
101
8.9
11
8.4
100
8.3
10
9.0
109
Configuration
6.8
19
Not enough data
7.8
20
Not enough data
7.7
19
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
Visibility
8.6
23
Not enough data
7.9
20
Not enough data
Vulnerability Management
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
21
Not enough data
8.8
21
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
14
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.9
15
Not enough data
Tracking
7.9
12
Not enough data
7.3
11
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
9.0
20
Not enough data
8.5
19
Not enough data
8.9
19
Not enough data
8.3
18
Not enough data
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
9.1
18
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
8.3
19
Not enough data
8.5
19
Not enough data
7.7
19
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
7.5
6
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)Hide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Artificial Intelligence - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Configuration Management - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
39
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.9
37
Value Management
Not enough data
9.0
39
Not enough data
8.7
41
Not enough data
8.9
40
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Aikido Security and GitLab are categorized as Software Composition Analysis, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Static Application Security Testing (SAST), and Secure Code Review
Unique Categories
Aikido Security is categorized as Penetration Testing, AI AppSec Assistants, Software Supply Chain Security Tools, Application Security Posture Management (ASPM), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM), Container Security, Vulnerability Scanner, and Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Aikido Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
37.3%
Information Technology and Services
17.6%
Hospital & Health Care
6.9%
Computer & Network Security
5.9%
Retail
3.9%
Other
28.4%
Computer Software
33.5%
Information Technology and Services
24.1%
Internet
3.9%
Financial Services
3.4%
Telecommunications
2.2%
Other
32.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
Aikido Security has no discussions with answers
Is GitLab paid?
5 Comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 Comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
