Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Aikido Security and GitHub 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
OX Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (76.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
$0.00 1 users
Aikido Security
Star Rating
(104)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (76.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 5 pricing plansGitHub
Star Rating
(2,267)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in its Command-Line Tools, scoring 9.1, which allows for seamless integration into development workflows. In contrast, Aikido Security's score of 6.9 indicates a less robust command-line experience, which may hinder users who rely heavily on terminal operations.
- Reviewers mention that Aikido Security shines in Static Code Analysis, achieving a score of 9.2, which is significantly higher than GitHub's 8.3. This suggests that Aikido provides more thorough insights into code vulnerabilities, making it a better choice for security-focused teams.
- Users on G2 highlight GitHub's superior Issue Tracking capabilities, with a score of 8.6 compared to Aikido Security's 8.9. Reviewers appreciate GitHub's integration with project management tools, which enhances collaboration among development teams.
- Reviewers mention that Aikido Security offers better Quality of Support, scoring 9.5 against GitHub's 8.7. Users appreciate Aikido's responsive customer service and detailed documentation, which can be crucial for teams needing quick resolutions to issues.
- G2 users report that GitHub's Ease of Use is rated at 8.7, while Aikido Security leads with a score of 9.5. This indicates that Aikido may provide a more intuitive user interface, making it easier for new users to adopt the software without extensive training.
- Users say that both products have similar scores in API / Integrations at 8.8, indicating that both GitHub and Aikido Security offer robust integration capabilities with other tools. However, GitHub's extensive ecosystem may provide a slight edge for teams looking for a wide range of integrations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Aikido Security
Free (forever)
Free
For developers and curious minds
- Up to 2 users, 10 repos, 1 domain & 1 cloud account
- Cloud posture management (CSPM)
- Open source dependency scanning (SCA)
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Free Trial
Aikido Security
Free Trial is available
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
101
9.3
1,964
Ease of Use
9.4
102
8.7
1,980
Ease of Setup
9.5
94
9.0
591
Ease of Admin
9.4
63
8.7
451
Quality of Support
9.4
84
8.8
1,571
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
57
8.9
387
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
101
8.9
1,916
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Processes
Not enough data
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.6
56
9.2
48
Feature Not Available
9.0
47
Analysis
8.7
54
8.7
47
8.9
54
8.9
50
9.0
54
8.9
48
8.9
53
9.0
50
Testing
7.3
42
9.3
49
7.0
41
8.6
44
8.1
43
8.7
45
8.4
44
8.9
43
8.2
42
8.7
42
Feature Not Available
9.0
43
7.6
46
8.5
42
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
8.3
24
10.0
14
Administration
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Analysis
9.2
21
Not enough data
9.1
21
Not enough data
9.4
21
Not enough data
9.4
21
Not enough data
9.5
20
Not enough data
Testing
6.8
17
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.5
18
Not enough data
8.0
18
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
6.5
18
Not enough data
Administration
8.8
36
Not enough data
8.1
34
Not enough data
9.0
34
Not enough data
8.3
32
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.6
35
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Protection
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.4
33
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.6
31
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
98
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
97
Not enough data
8.9
91
IT Management
Not enough data
9.0
100
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Performance
8.7
60
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.7
58
Not enough data
8.9
59
Not enough data
Network
7.9
57
Not enough data
7.9
54
Not enough data
7.9
55
Not enough data
Application
7.2
52
Not enough data
8.8
56
Not enough data
7.9
50
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
7.8
24
Not enough data
7.6
24
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Management
Not enough data
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.5
231
Not enough data
9.0
239
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
9.0
21
8.9
74
9.0
21
9.1
79
9.0
21
9.2
78
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
9.0
21
8.9
76
9.0
21
9.1
78
9.1
21
8.9
76
Management
Not enough data
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
138
Not enough data
8.6
133
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
136
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Processes
Not enough data
8.9
137
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
139
Functionality
Not enough data
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Management
Not enough data
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Documentation
9.6
9
8.8
185
9.6
9
8.8
179
8.3
9
8.6
170
Security
7.9
12
8.3
167
8.9
11
8.6
168
8.3
10
9.0
177
Configuration
6.8
19
Not enough data
7.8
20
Not enough data
7.7
19
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
Visibility
8.6
23
Not enough data
7.9
20
Not enough data
Vulnerability Management
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
21
Not enough data
8.8
21
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
Security
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
14
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.9
15
Not enough data
Tracking
7.9
12
Not enough data
7.3
11
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
9.0
20
Not enough data
8.5
19
Not enough data
8.9
19
Not enough data
8.3
18
Not enough data
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
9.1
18
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
8.3
19
Not enough data
8.5
19
Not enough data
7.7
19
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
7.5
6
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)Hide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Artificial Intelligence - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Configuration Management - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Aikido Security and GitHub are categorized as Software Composition Analysis, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), and Secure Code Review
Unique Categories
Aikido Security is categorized as Penetration Testing, AI AppSec Assistants, Software Supply Chain Security Tools, Application Security Posture Management (ASPM), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM), Container Security, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Vulnerability Scanner, and Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Aikido Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
37.3%
Information Technology and Services
17.6%
Hospital & Health Care
6.9%
Computer & Network Security
5.9%
Retail
3.9%
Other
28.4%
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.2%
Discussions
Aikido Security has no discussions with answers
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
