Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Agicap and Float 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Serrala
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aleph
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Nickel
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (74.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
No pricing available
Agicap
Star Rating
(298)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansFloat
Star Rating
(45)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (74.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about FloatSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Float Cash Flow Forecasting excels in its "Income and Expenses" tracking, scoring a remarkable 9.6, while Agicap trails slightly with a score of 8.6. Reviewers mention that Float's intuitive interface makes it easier to manage and visualize cash flow.
- Reviewers say that Agicap shines in "Variance Analysis" with a score of 8.4, compared to Float's 7.0. Users on G2 highlight Agicap's robust reporting capabilities, which allow for deeper insights into financial performance.
- G2 users note that Float Cash Flow Forecasting has a superior "Budget Periods" feature, scoring 9.4, which allows for flexible budgeting timelines. In contrast, Agicap's budget management features are perceived as less adaptable, with a score of 8.4.
- Users say that Agicap offers better "Quality of Support," with a score of 9.3, while Float Cash Flow Forecasting scores 8.8. Reviewers mention that Agicap's customer service is responsive and helpful, which is crucial for users needing immediate assistance.
- Reviewers mention that Float's "Automated Cash Operations" feature, scoring only 7.0, is a significant area for improvement, as users find it less efficient compared to Agicap's offerings, which are more streamlined and user-friendly.
- Users report that both products perform well in "Rolling Forecasts," each scoring 8.7, but Agicap's additional features for "Forecast Types" (8.4) provide users with more options for tailoring their forecasts compared to Float's lower score of 6.4.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Agicap
Business
Contact Us
Put cashflow at the heart of your company's development
- Cashflow monitoring
- Cashflow forecast
- Scenarios creation
Float
No pricing availableFree Trial
Agicap
Free Trial is available
Float
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.4
260
8.4
35
Ease of Use
8.9
266
8.7
35
Ease of Setup
8.1
225
8.9
17
Ease of Admin
8.7
129
9.0
17
Quality of Support
9.1
255
8.8
32
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
124
9.4
17
Product Direction (% positive)
9.6
265
8.5
31
Features by Category
Budget Creation
Not enough data
8.8
20
Not enough data
8.6
20
Not enough data
7.9
17
Not enough data
9.2
14
Not enough data
8.6
21
Not enough data
9.4
18
Budget Management
Not enough data
7.4
15
Not enough data
8.2
18
Not enough data
8.4
16
Forecasting
Not enough data
8.0
21
Not enough data
8.8
20
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
9.3
20
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytics
Not enough data
8.4
19
Not enough data
7.5
18
Not enough data
8.2
18
Agentic AI - Budgeting and Forecasting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cash Management
8.9
115
Not enough data
7.7
110
Not enough data
8.2
109
Not enough data
7.6
108
Not enough data
7.3
108
Not enough data
7.4
101
Not enough data
Risk and Compliance
6.3
102
Not enough data
7.0
101
Not enough data
6.5
99
Not enough data
6.3
94
Not enough data
Analytics
8.4
105
Not enough data
7.7
101
Not enough data
7.6
97
Not enough data
7.8
97
Not enough data
Banking
8.1
104
Not enough data
8.4
104
Not enough data
7.2
96
Not enough data
7.9
100
Not enough data
Integration
7.3
99
Not enough data
7.5
95
Not enough data
6.1
90
Not enough data
7.2
95
Not enough data
Financial Data Transfer
7.3
90
Not enough data
8.0
97
Not enough data
7.9
97
Not enough data
7.4
95
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Treasury Management Systems
6.1
26
Not enough data
6.0
26
Not enough data
6.5
25
Not enough data
Data Management
7.9
76
Not enough data
8.2
77
Not enough data
6.8
60
Not enough data
7.2
59
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounts Payable (AP) and Spend Analysis
5.1
17
Not enough data
Analytics
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.7
77
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Recovery
7.9
75
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
AP Data Processing
7.4
72
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Cash Flow Management
8.4
220
7.3
5
8.4
182
9.6
8
8.7
220
9.6
8
Cash Flow Forecasting
8.4
180
7.4
7
8.1
176
7.5
6
8.1
213
6.4
6
8.2
174
8.7
5
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Analytics
7.9
167
7.0
5
8.0
212
7.0
5
Feature Not Available
7.2
6
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Financial Data Transfer
7.4
172
Feature Not Available
7.4
169
7.2
6
7.9
174
7.8
6
8.2
179
8.1
7
7.7
206
8.3
7
Agentic AI - Cash Flow Management
6.5
56
Not enough data
Reporting
8.1
38
Not enough data
7.6
45
Not enough data
8.0
38
Not enough data
Integrations
7.2
35
Not enough data
6.8
34
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Transactions
7.5
36
Not enough data
8.1
50
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Workflows
7.9
49
Not enough data
7.8
36
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounts Receivable Automation
6.4
7
Not enough data
AI - Accounts Receivable
4.7
6
Not enough data
3.9
6
Not enough data
4.4
6
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Agicap and Float are categorized as Cash Flow Management
Unique Categories
Agicap is categorized as Accounts Payable (AP) and Spend Analysis, Accounts Receivable, and Treasury Management Systems
Float is categorized as Budgeting and Forecasting
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Agicap
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Float
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Accounting
14.3%
Computer Software
8.1%
Consulting
5.1%
Information Technology and Services
5.1%
Consumer Services
3.3%
Other
64.1%
Marketing and Advertising
16.3%
Information Technology and Services
11.6%
Computer Software
9.3%
Retail
4.7%
Design
4.7%
Other
53.5%
Discussions
Agicap has no discussions with answers
Float has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
