Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Agicap and Embat 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.8% of reviews)
Mid-Market (78.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
No pricing available
Agicap
Star Rating
(308)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansEmbat
Star Rating
(36)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (78.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about EmbatSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Agicap excels in overall user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher G2 Score compared to Embat. Users appreciate its intuitive interface and robust cash flow forecasting tools, which help streamline decision-making and provide a clear view of liquidity.
- According to verified reviews, Agicap's implementation process is praised for its ease, with users highlighting the seamless integration with banks and the ability to organize invoices effectively. In contrast, Embat, while also user-friendly, has received mixed feedback regarding its setup process.
- Users say that Agicap's quality of support is a standout feature, with many noting the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. This is particularly beneficial for small businesses that may require more guidance. Embat, while providing decent support, does not match the high praise Agicap receives in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Agicap's reporting capabilities are robust, allowing users to generate detailed cash flow statements and forecasts easily. This feature is a significant advantage for businesses looking to maintain financial clarity. Embat also offers reporting tools, but users feel they are not as comprehensive or intuitive as those in Agicap.
- Users appreciate Embat's integration with ERP systems like NetSuite, which simplifies bank transaction reconciliation and provides a consolidated view of accounts. However, Agicap's strong bank integration and cash flow management features are often highlighted as more beneficial for users focused on liquidity management.
- According to recent feedback, both products are easy to use, but Agicap's overall user experience is rated slightly higher. Users find Agicap's interface more intuitive, which enhances daily usability, while Embat's strengths lie in its straightforward reconciliation processes.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Agicap
Business
Contact Us
Put cashflow at the heart of your company's development
- Cashflow monitoring
- Cashflow forecast
- Scenarios creation
Embat
No pricing availableFree Trial
Agicap
Free Trial is available
Embat
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.4
270
8.3
31
Ease of Use
8.8
276
8.9
33
Ease of Setup
8.1
235
7.9
33
Ease of Admin
8.7
135
8.8
18
Quality of Support
9.1
265
8.5
32
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
130
8.7
18
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
275
9.6
32
Features by Category
Payment Methods
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Payment Processing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security and Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Payment Types
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Enterprise Payment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cash Management
8.9
120
8.7
23
7.7
111
7.8
18
8.2
111
7.6
18
7.6
108
8.2
19
7.3
108
7.8
18
7.3
102
8.2
19
Risk and Compliance
6.3
103
7.3
17
7.0
101
7.9
19
6.5
99
7.5
18
6.3
94
7.2
18
Analytics
8.4
105
8.2
19
7.7
101
7.9
18
7.6
97
7.7
17
7.8
97
7.7
18
Banking
8.1
105
8.5
22
8.4
106
8.8
20
7.2
96
Feature Not Available
7.9
102
8.5
19
Integration
7.3
100
8.3
22
7.5
95
7.9
19
6.1
90
Feature Not Available
7.3
96
7.7
17
Financial Data Transfer
7.3
90
8.1
16
8.0
97
8.0
19
7.9
97
8.0
17
7.4
95
8.2
18
Agentic AI - Treasury Management Systems
6.2
27
Not enough data
6.0
26
Not enough data
6.5
25
Not enough data
Data Management
8.0
77
Not enough data
8.2
78
Not enough data
6.8
60
Not enough data
7.2
60
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounts Payable (AP) and Spend Analysis
5.1
17
Not enough data
Analytics
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.7
77
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Recovery
7.9
75
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
AP Data Processing
7.4
73
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Cash Flow Management
8.4
221
8.2
17
8.5
183
8.0
16
8.7
226
8.3
16
Cash Flow Forecasting
8.4
181
8.0
16
8.1
177
7.3
16
8.1
215
8.0
15
8.2
175
7.5
16
Feature Not Available
7.8
16
Analytics
7.9
168
8.0
15
8.0
214
8.1
15
Feature Not Available
7.6
15
Feature Not Available
7.8
15
Financial Data Transfer
7.4
173
8.2
14
7.4
170
7.7
13
7.9
175
8.2
14
8.2
180
8.7
14
7.7
207
8.1
14
Agentic AI - Cash Flow Management
6.5
56
Not enough data
Reporting
8.1
38
Not enough data
7.6
45
Not enough data
8.0
38
Not enough data
Integrations
7.1
36
Not enough data
6.9
35
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Transactions
7.5
36
Not enough data
8.1
50
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Workflows
7.9
49
Not enough data
7.8
36
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounts Receivable Automation
6.4
7
Not enough data
AI - Accounts Receivable
6.0
8
Not enough data
3.9
6
Not enough data
4.4
6
Not enough data
Reconciliation - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
6.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Audit - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integrations - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
User Permissions and Security - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Agicap and Embat are categorized as Cash Flow Management and Treasury Management Systems
Unique Categories
Agicap is categorized as Accounts Payable (AP) and Spend Analysis and Accounts Receivable
Embat is categorized as Financial Reconciliation and Enterprise Payment
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Agicap
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Embat
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Accounting
14.8%
Computer Software
7.8%
Consulting
4.9%
Information Technology and Services
4.9%
Construction
3.5%
Other
64.0%
Accounting
33.3%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
12.1%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
9.1%
Restaurants
6.1%
Internet
6.1%
Other
33.3%
Discussions
Agicap has no discussions with answers
Embat has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
