Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Aerospike and ScyllaDB 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CockroachDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Starburst
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ILUM
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (40.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Aerospike for Pricing
No pricing available
Aerospike
Star Rating
(83)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Aerospike for Pricing
Browse all 2 pricing plansScyllaDB
Star Rating
(359)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ScyllaDBSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Aerospike excels in auto sharding with a score of 9.2, allowing for seamless scaling and distribution of data across nodes, while ScyllaDB's auto sharding feature scores lower at 8.6, indicating potential challenges in scaling under heavy loads.
- Reviewers mention that Aerospike's data replication capabilities are robust, scoring 9.3, which ensures high availability and data durability, whereas ScyllaDB's replication score of 8.1 suggests it may not be as reliable in critical scenarios.
- G2 users highlight Aerospike's quality of support with a score of 8.9, indicating a strong partnership experience, while ScyllaDB's support score of 8.3 suggests room for improvement in customer service responsiveness.
- Users on G2 report that Aerospike's performance analysis features are superior, scoring 9.0, which helps in monitoring and optimizing database performance, compared to ScyllaDB's lower score of 8.0 in this area.
- Reviewers say that Aerospike's data model flexibility is a standout feature with a score of 9.1, allowing for diverse data types and structures, while ScyllaDB's score of 8.1 indicates it may be less adaptable to varying data needs.
- Users report that Aerospike's integrated cache feature scores 9.0, significantly enhancing query performance, whereas ScyllaDB's score of 8.0 suggests it may not provide the same level of efficiency in data retrieval.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Aerospike
Enterprise Edition
Contact Aerospike for Pricing
The Aerospike Enterprise Edition comes with access to 24×7×365 production support and Aerospike experts, tested deployment planning, performance health checks, and tune-ups. Aerospike Enterprise Edition customers also receive tested and certified binaries as well as hot patches to ensure non-stop operations. In addition, the Enterprise Edition comes with a series of enterprise-class features such as Cross Datacenter Replication™ (XDR), Fast Restart, Rapid Rebalance, and Security.
- Strong Consistency
- Cross Datacenter Replication (XDR)
- Multi-Tiered Storage Engine
ScyllaDB
No pricing availableFree Trial
Aerospike
Free Trial is available
ScyllaDB
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
71
8.8
303
Ease of Use
8.5
71
8.6
312
Ease of Setup
8.6
42
8.3
221
Ease of Admin
8.3
41
8.2
115
Quality of Support
8.9
66
8.5
283
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
39
8.7
95
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
65
9.2
295
Features by Category
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Maintenance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
9.1
9
|
Verified
8.6
145
9.2
8
|
Verified
8.7
150
Availability
9.2
8
|
Verified
8.9
146
9.0
7
|
Verified
8.6
144
9.3
9
|
Verified
8.6
144
Performance
9.0
8
|
Verified
8.7
141
Security
8.0
5
|
Verified
8.3
134
8.1
7
|
Verified
8.5
136
7.3
5
|
Verified
8.4
133
8.0
5
|
Verified
8.5
133
Support
9.2
6
|
Verified
8.5
130
8.3
7
|
Verified
8.5
136
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Storage
Not enough data
8.4
67
Scalability
Not enough data
9.0
72
Not enough data
8.6
68
Security
Not enough data
8.1
63
Support
Not enough data
8.5
71
Not enough data
8.4
69
Not enough data
8.2
65
Agentic AI - Wide Column Database
Not enough data
7.0
5
Query latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Connectors
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Scale
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Architecture
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Configuration
Not enough data
9.2
146
Not enough data
8.8
139
Not enough data
8.9
143
Not enough data
8.4
134
Not enough data
8.7
135
Database Administration
Not enough data
8.8
136
Not enough data
8.7
131
Not enough data
8.7
131
Availability
Not enough data
9.4
144
Not enough data
8.9
141
Not enough data
8.9
134
Not enough data
8.8
140
Security
Not enough data
8.7
122
Not enough data
8.6
123
Not enough data
8.7
123
Data Management
Not enough data
8.9
132
Not enough data
8.7
126
Database
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integrations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Processing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Aerospike and ScyllaDB are categorized as Key Value Databases
Unique Categories
Aerospike is categorized as Real-time Analytic Database, Document Databases, Graph Databases, Database Management Systems (DBMS), Time Series Databases, and Big Data Processing and Distribution
ScyllaDB is categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS) and Wide Column Database
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Aerospike
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
ScyllaDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Marketing and Advertising
18.8%
Information Technology and Services
18.8%
Computer Software
17.5%
Internet
12.5%
Financial Services
10.0%
Other
22.5%
Computer Software
29.6%
Information Technology and Services
12.6%
Financial Services
5.7%
Banking
3.7%
Education Management
3.4%
Other
44.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
Why should I consider using Aerospike Enterprise Edition versus the Open Source Aerospike Community Edition?
1 Comment
SW
More features with supportRead more
Aerospike has no more discussions with answers
What is the agenda for the coming quarter, what new features will be introduced?
2 Comments
PC
Planned features for Scylla Open Source 4.x and 5.x
• Enhancements to our DynamoDB compatible API (Alternator)
• Faster resumable streaming (Repair base...Read more
ScyllaDB has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
