When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Adobe FrameMaker easier to use and set up. However, reviewers felt that administration of both products was equally easy, and preferred doing business with MadCap Flare overall.
Reviewers felt that MadCap Flare meets the needs of their business better than Adobe FrameMaker.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that MadCap Flare is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of MadCap Flare over Adobe FrameMaker.
Adobe FrameMaker is a document processor designed for writing and editing large or complex documents, including structured documents with FrameMaker XML. It...Read more
Adobe FrameMaker has no more discussions with answers
MadCap Flare is not cloud-based per se. However, MadCap Central recently enabled cloud-based authoring that syncs up with Flare. Here's the link to their...Read more
How much is MadCap Central?
2 Comments
MM
MadCap is pretty transparent about their pricing plans, which you can find on there site at https://www.madcapsoftware.com/pricing/. The current rate for an...Read more
How long does it take to learn how to use MadCap Flare?
1 Comment
MM
For the very basic features like moving around the interface, adding topics, and creating targets (i.e., output), you can be productive within a couple of...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.