Compare Adobe Dreamweaver and Bluefish
 Adobe Dreamweaver |  Bluefish | |
| Star Rating | Adobe Dreamweaver | Bluefish |
| Market Segments | Adobe Dreamweaver Small-Business (55.9% of reviews) | Bluefish Small-Business (63.4% of reviews) |
| Entry Level Price | Adobe Dreamweaver No pricing information available | Bluefish No pricing information available |
Adobe Dreamweaver vs Bluefish
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Bluefish easier to use. However, Adobe Dreamweaver is easier to set up and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Adobe Dreamweaver overall.
- Reviewers felt that Adobe Dreamweaver meets the needs of their business better than Bluefish.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Bluefish is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Bluefish over Adobe Dreamweaver.
Adobe makes great products plain and simply. I have to give them credit for making a good quality tool. While using dreamweaver to create websites is no longer my preference, it's still got everything you need. Some people love it, some don't. I just prefer...
I like that as a business we work with a designer to create custom websites and html that cater to our individual needs and style.
It's UI is bloated with very edge-case actions / options. High level most-common User flows are not streamlined. This makes it very difficult for anyone new to the program, and especially anyone new to HTML / CSS / JS coding. As an IDE it's not as...
There aren't enough features. The dealbreaker for me was the ability to sync local files to my server.
