Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare ColdFusion Builder and Zephyr Enterprise

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
ColdFusion Builder
ColdFusion Builder
Star Rating
(35)3.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.4% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ColdFusion Builder
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
Star Rating
(80)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.6% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Zephyr Enterprise
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Zephyr Enterprise excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring an impressive 8.8, which allows for efficient management and organization of test cases, while ColdFusion Builder lacks a dedicated test repository feature, making it less effective for users focused on testing.
  • Reviewers mention that Zephyr Enterprise offers superior integration capabilities with a score of 8.3, enabling seamless connections with various tools and platforms, whereas ColdFusion Builder's integration options are more limited, which can hinder workflow efficiency.
  • G2 users highlight the robust Reporting feature of Zephyr Enterprise, which received a high score of 9.2, allowing for detailed insights and analytics on testing processes, while ColdFusion Builder's reporting capabilities are not as comprehensive, leading to less visibility into project performance.
  • Users on G2 indicate that Zephyr Enterprise's version control feature, rated at 8.8, provides a reliable way to manage changes and track test case versions, a critical aspect for teams working on large projects, whereas ColdFusion Builder's version control is less intuitive and can lead to confusion among users.
  • Reviewers say that the quality of support for Zephyr Enterprise is notably higher, with a score of 8.3, reflecting positive experiences with customer service, while ColdFusion Builder's support is rated lower at 6.4, indicating potential challenges for users seeking assistance.
  • Users report that Zephyr Enterprise shines in its ease of setup, scoring 8.3, which allows teams to get started quickly, while ColdFusion Builder's setup process is rated lower at 7.4, suggesting a steeper learning curve for new users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ColdFusion Builder
No pricing available
Zephyr Enterprise
No pricing available
Free Trial
ColdFusion Builder
No trial information available
Zephyr Enterprise
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
7.2
31
8.3
69
Ease of Use
7.7
31
7.8
71
Ease of Setup
7.4
13
8.4
39
Ease of Admin
8.1
13
8.6
38
Quality of Support
6.4
30
8.2
55
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.4
12
8.3
33
Product Direction (% positive)
4.7
31
7.1
69
Features by Category
Not enough data
8.4
12
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
8.5
12
Management
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
7.6
9
Application Development PlatformsHide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Mobile Development PlatformsHide 3 FeaturesShow 3 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Mobile Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ColdFusion Builder
ColdFusion Builder
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
ColdFusion Builder and Zephyr Enterprise are categorized as Software Testing
Unique Categories
ColdFusion Builder
ColdFusion Builder is categorized as Mobile Development Platforms and Application Development Platforms
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise is categorized as Automation Testing and Test Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ColdFusion Builder
ColdFusion Builder
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
36.4%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
39.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
24.2%
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
41.6%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
35.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
23.4%
Reviewers' Industry
ColdFusion Builder
ColdFusion Builder
Computer Software
24.2%
Information Technology and Services
9.1%
Higher Education
9.1%
Law Practice
6.1%
Hospital & Health Care
6.1%
Other
45.5%
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
Computer Software
22.1%
Information Technology and Services
19.5%
Telecommunications
6.5%
Marketing and Advertising
3.9%
Internet
3.9%
Other
44.2%
Alternatives
ColdFusion Builder
ColdFusion Builder Alternatives
OutSystems
OutSystems
Add OutSystems
Claris FileMaker
Claris FileMaker
Add Claris FileMaker
Salesforce Platform
Salesforce Platform
Add Salesforce Platform
Quickbase
Quickbase
Add Quickbase
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Qase
Qase
Add Qase
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Add OpenText Application Quality Management
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Add Tricentis qTest
Discussions
ColdFusion Builder
ColdFusion Builder Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
ColdFusion Builder has no discussions with answers
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Zephyr Enterprise has no discussions with answers