Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Adobe Captivate and SoftChalk 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
GetResponse
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Speakable
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Synap
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.8% of reviews)
Mid-Market (61.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$399
$695 per year
Adobe Captivate
Star Rating
(202)3.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$399
Browse all 3 pricing plansSoftChalk
Star Rating
(18)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (61.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
$695 per year
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Adobe Captivate excels in content creation with a score of 8.5, while SoftChalk shines even brighter with a remarkable score of 9.7, indicating a more robust set of tools for creating engaging eLearning content.
- Reviewers mention that Adobe Captivate offers a variety of question types for assessments, but SoftChalk's pre-made content and alignment to standards are particularly praised, making it easier for educators to implement effective learning paths.
- G2 users highlight that Adobe Captivate has a lower ease of use rating (6.8) compared to SoftChalk (8.1), suggesting that users find SoftChalk more intuitive and user-friendly for creating and managing courses.
- Users on G2 report that while both platforms offer analytics and reporting features, SoftChalk's analytics dashboard is noted for being more comprehensive and easier to navigate, enhancing the user experience in tracking learner progress.
- Reviewers say that Adobe Captivate's integration APIs score lower (7.1) compared to SoftChalk's offerings, indicating that users may find it more challenging to integrate Captivate with other systems compared to SoftChalk's more seamless integration capabilities.
- Users report that while both products offer mobile compatibility, SoftChalk's performance in this area is rated higher (7.4), suggesting a better experience for learners accessing content on mobile devices.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial
Adobe Captivate
Free Trial is available
SoftChalk
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.3
173
8.5
17
Ease of Use
6.7
173
8.1
17
Ease of Setup
7.7
64
8.3
7
Ease of Admin
7.8
57
7.6
7
Quality of Support
6.9
141
7.7
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.3
51
8.6
7
Product Direction (% positive)
7.1
176
5.6
16
Features by Category
Assessment delivery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Grading and reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Training & eLearning
8.5
130
9.7
5
7.5
90
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Course Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Learning Content
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Personalization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting and Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Learning Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Adobe Captivate and SoftChalk are categorized as Course Authoring
Unique Categories
Adobe Captivate has no unique categories
SoftChalk is categorized as Digital Learning Platforms and Assessment
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Adobe Captivate
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SoftChalk
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
E-Learning
11.5%
Computer Software
9.4%
Information Technology and Services
8.9%
Higher Education
8.9%
Education Management
4.7%
Other
56.5%
Higher Education
61.1%
E-Learning
16.7%
Education Management
11.1%
Primary/Secondary Education
5.6%
Media Production
5.6%
Other
0.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Between Captivate and Storyline, which elearning tool is better?
3 Comments
SL
This s a matter of opinion, but the short answer is probably Storyline. Captivate is still the king of screen captures. Though you can capture screens and...Read more
What is Adobe Captivate used for?
2 Comments
PP
Adobe Captivate is used mainly to create content for elarning. You can create interactive, personalised and engaging elearning content. Read more
SoftChalk has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
