Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Acunetix by Invicti and GitLab 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cyclopt Companion
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (37.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Acunetix by Invicti
Star Rating
(105)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Acunetix by InvictiGitLab
Star Rating
(864)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Acunetix by Invicti excels in its Vulnerability Assessment feature, with a score of 8.9, highlighting its thorough detection capabilities. In contrast, GitLab's Vulnerability Scan also scores well at 8.8, but users mention that it lacks some of the depth found in Acunetix's assessments.
- Reviewers mention that GitLab shines in Test Automation, scoring 9.1, which is significantly higher than Acunetix's score of 8.0. Users appreciate GitLab's seamless integration of automated testing within CI/CD pipelines, making it a preferred choice for development teams.
- G2 users highlight Acunetix's False Positives rate as a concern, scoring only 6.6, which reviewers say can lead to unnecessary manual checks. In contrast, GitLab's false positive score is much higher at 9.2, indicating a more reliable detection process that users find beneficial.
- Users on G2 report that Acunetix's Quality of Support is rated at 7.8, which some reviewers say could be improved, especially in response times. GitLab, however, has a higher support rating of 8.5, with users mentioning more responsive and helpful customer service experiences.
- Reviewers mention that Acunetix's Automated Scans feature is robust, scoring 8.6, and is particularly praised for its ease of use. GitLab's Compliance Testing feature, scoring 9.0, is noted for its effectiveness in ensuring regulatory adherence, which users find essential for their projects.
- Users say that GitLab's Integration capabilities score 8.9, making it easier to connect with various tools and services, which is a significant advantage for teams looking for a comprehensive DevOps solution. Acunetix, while offering integrations, scores lower at 7.5, leading some users to feel limited in their options.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Acunetix by Invicti
No pricing availableGitLab
No pricing availableFree Trial
Acunetix by Invicti
Free Trial is available
GitLab
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
90
9.1
654
Ease of Use
8.5
91
8.7
656
Ease of Setup
8.5
66
8.6
217
Ease of Admin
8.4
60
8.6
172
Quality of Support
7.8
85
8.5
518
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.2
58
8.8
147
Product Direction (% positive)
7.6
89
8.7
621
Features by Category
Administration
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.1
31
Not enough data
8.4
28
Not enough data
Risk Analysis
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
31
Not enough data
8.3
27
Not enough data
Threat Protection
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.4
21
Not enough data
7.6
22
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Generative AI
6.4
6
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.7
123
Not enough data
8.9
131
Not enough data
8.6
123
Functionality
Not enough data
9.0
129
Not enough data
8.5
115
Not enough data
8.5
109
Not enough data
8.7
114
Not enough data
8.6
103
Processes
Not enough data
9.1
132
Not enough data
9.0
121
Not enough data
8.7
121
Administration
7.5
25
Not enough data
7.4
26
Not enough data
8.6
32
Not enough data
Analysis
8.1
28
Not enough data
7.7
31
Not enough data
8.6
33
Not enough data
Testing
6.5
20
Not enough data
7.3
24
Not enough data
8.3
28
Not enough data
8.1
30
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
9.2
28
Not enough data
9.0
27
Analysis
Not enough data
8.7
26
Not enough data
9.0
27
Not enough data
9.1
27
Not enough data
8.9
25
Testing
Not enough data
8.8
27
Not enough data
8.7
26
Not enough data
9.1
26
Not enough data
8.8
26
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
8.8
24
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
7.9
25
9.2
25
7.6
26
8.9
24
Analysis
8.4
30
8.5
24
7.9
28
9.2
24
Feature Not Available
8.8
24
8.7
30
8.9
24
8.0
22
9.0
24
Testing
7.6
23
8.6
23
8.1
29
9.1
23
8.3
24
8.9
22
8.5
28
9.0
21
8.7
25
9.0
20
6.9
27
9.1
21
Administration
Not enough data
8.7
77
Not enough data
8.7
78
Not enough data
8.7
75
Not enough data
8.8
80
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
79
Not enough data
8.4
72
Not enough data
9.0
79
Not enough data
8.7
73
IT Management
Not enough data
8.7
74
Not enough data
8.9
74
Not enough data
8.6
71
Performance
8.2
27
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
6.9
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
35
|
Verified
Not enough data
Network
8.7
28
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
27
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.9
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
Application
8.2
27
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.5
23
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
33
|
Verified
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
213
Not enough data
9.0
215
Not enough data
8.7
205
Management
Not enough data
8.8
199
Not enough data
8.4
191
Not enough data
8.9
207
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.2
9
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.6
139
Not enough data
8.5
133
Not enough data
8.6
140
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.4
136
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.8
135
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.7
65
Not enough data
8.8
70
Not enough data
8.7
67
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.8
64
Not enough data
9.0
64
Not enough data
9.0
61
Management
Not enough data
8.8
142
Not enough data
8.8
147
Not enough data
8.5
135
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
148
Not enough data
8.8
148
Not enough data
8.7
139
Processes
Not enough data
9.0
152
Not enough data
8.5
140
Not enough data
9.0
155
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
226
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
210
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
204
|
Verified
Management
Not enough data
8.9
214
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
215
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
197
|
Verified
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
7.3
11
Not enough data
7.6
13
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
7.1
11
Not enough data
7.6
11
Documentation
Not enough data
8.8
116
Not enough data
8.6
112
Not enough data
8.4
112
Security
Not enough data
8.0
101
Not enough data
8.4
100
Not enough data
9.0
109
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
39
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.9
37
Value Management
Not enough data
9.0
39
Not enough data
8.7
41
Not enough data
8.9
40
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Acunetix by Invicti and GitLab are categorized as Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Unique Categories
Acunetix by Invicti is categorized as Penetration Testing, Website Security, and Vulnerability Scanner
GitLab is categorized as Secure Code Review, DevOps Platforms, Value Stream Management, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Bug Tracking, Continuous Integration, and AI Code Generation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Acunetix by Invicti
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
21.0%
Computer Software
15.0%
Computer & Network Security
11.0%
Telecommunications
10.0%
Financial Services
6.0%
Other
37.0%
Computer Software
33.6%
Information Technology and Services
24.1%
Internet
3.9%
Financial Services
3.4%
Telecommunications
2.2%
Other
32.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
Does Acunetix Integrate with Web Application Firewalls?
1 Comment
JG
Yes, Acunetix Premium supports WAFs integrations with:
Imperva SecureSphere
F5 BIG-IP Application Security Manager
FortiWeb WAF
Citrix WAF
For more...Read more
Acunetix by Invicti has no more discussions with answers
Is GitLab paid?
5 Comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 Comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
