Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ActiveBatch and JSCAPE MFT Server 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cerberus FTP Server
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
StorageLink
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Astro by Astronomer
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.7% of reviews)
Mid-Market (49.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
No pricing available
ActiveBatch
Star Rating
(213)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Learn more about ActiveBatchJSCAPE MFT Server
Star Rating
(95)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (49.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about JSCAPE MFT ServerSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that ActiveBatch Workload Automation excels in "Job Scheduling" with a score of 9.6, allowing for complex scheduling needs, while JSCAPE MFT Server, although strong, scores slightly lower in this area, indicating that ActiveBatch may be better suited for organizations with intricate scheduling requirements.
- Reviewers mention that ActiveBatch's "Workflow Automation" feature is rated at 9.5, providing robust capabilities for automating business processes, whereas JSCAPE MFT Server, with a score of 9.1, may not offer the same level of depth in workflow automation, making ActiveBatch a preferable choice for users focused on extensive automation.
- G2 users highlight that JSCAPE MFT Server shines in "Encryption" with a score of 9.2, which is crucial for secure file transfers, while ActiveBatch's encryption score of 8.7 suggests that JSCAPE may be the better option for organizations prioritizing data security in their file transfer processes.
- Users on G2 report that ActiveBatch's "Scalability" is rated at 9.1, making it a strong candidate for enterprises looking to grow their automation capabilities, while JSCAPE MFT Server's scalability features are not as highly rated, indicating that ActiveBatch may better support larger, evolving business needs.
- Reviewers mention that JSCAPE MFT Server's "Application Integration" capabilities score 8.8, which is slightly better than ActiveBatch's 8.6, suggesting that JSCAPE may offer a more seamless experience when integrating with various applications, a critical factor for users needing extensive integration options.
- Users say that both products have strong "Quality of Support" ratings at 8.9, but JSCAPE MFT Server has a slight edge with a score of 9.1, indicating that users may find more responsive and helpful support when using JSCAPE, which can be a significant factor in software adoption and satisfaction.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ActiveBatch
Simple, Usage-Based Pricing
Contact Us
- Ease of use - connect to your entire tech stack with our low-code API adapter and no-code connectors for SQL Server, SharePoint, Informatica, ServiceNow, VMware and more.
- Outstanding out-of-the-box features, including predictive SLA, change management, auto-remediation and a complete managed transfer file suite.
- Monitoring, alerting and reporting - reduce time troubleshooting and manage dependencies better with flexible and customizable monitoring and alerting.
JSCAPE MFT Server
No pricing availableFree Trial
ActiveBatch
Free Trial is available
JSCAPE MFT Server
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
163
9.3
69
Ease of Use
8.8
161
9.1
78
Ease of Setup
8.4
112
8.8
49
Ease of Admin
8.7
101
8.9
31
Quality of Support
8.9
155
8.8
68
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
99
9.1
34
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
150
9.0
68
Features by Category
Automation
9.3
98
Not enough data
9.0
92
Not enough data
9.1
57
Not enough data
Administration
9.0
96
Not enough data
9.2
90
Not enough data
8.9
75
Not enough data
9.0
55
Not enough data
9.1
58
Not enough data
9.1
52
Not enough data
Functionality
9.5
100
Not enough data
8.7
77
Not enough data
9.0
50
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Workload Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Delivery
8.7
34
|
Verified
9.0
37
|
Verified
8.7
47
|
Verified
8.8
38
|
Verified
9.4
45
|
Verified
9.2
44
|
Verified
9.0
39
|
Verified
8.7
42
|
Verified
Functionality
8.8
24
|
Verified
8.5
37
|
Verified
8.6
34
|
Verified
9.2
46
|
Verified
8.8
44
|
Verified
9.1
37
|
Verified
7.8
45
|
Verified
8.2
43
|
Verified
Governance
8.8
46
|
Verified
8.8
44
|
Verified
8.9
36
|
Verified
9.0
44
|
Verified
9.0
47
|
Verified
8.8
49
|
Verified
Core Transfer Infrastructure - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.7
34
|
Verified
9.0
37
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Capabilities - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.6
34
|
Verified
9.2
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance Controls - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.8
46
|
Verified
8.8
44
|
Verified
8.9
36
|
Verified
9.0
44
|
Verified
9.0
47
|
Verified
8.8
49
|
Verified
Intelligent Automation & AI - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
9.4
21
Not enough data
9.2
20
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
Functionality
8.6
18
Not enough data
9.2
21
Not enough data
9.0
19
Not enough data
Administration
9.3
22
Not enough data
9.3
23
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Data Warehouse Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Process Orchestration
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration & Adaptability - Process Orchestration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ActiveBatch and JSCAPE MFT Server are categorized as Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Unique Categories
ActiveBatch is categorized as Data Warehouse Automation, Workload Automation, and Process Orchestration
JSCAPE MFT Server is categorized as File Transfer Protocol (FTP)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ActiveBatch
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
JSCAPE MFT Server
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
18.0%
Financial Services
17.1%
Hospital & Health Care
7.6%
Insurance
6.6%
Banking
6.2%
Other
44.5%
Information Technology and Services
25.8%
Financial Services
6.5%
Computer Software
5.4%
Banking
5.4%
Printing
4.3%
Other
52.7%
Discussions
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job. This is one area where the documentation can use recommendations. For example, I want to see how the job performed, via the log, from 10 days ago. Today, the log would show GetFile failed if older than three days, or thereabouts.
1 Comment
KW
All jobs have properties that determine how job log files are managed. The factory default setting is Centrally Managed Logging. This means that the location...Read more
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job?
1 Comment
NA
create a log file instead of having active batch manage it,Read more
ActiveBatch has no more discussions with answers
What is plan to improve support model?
1 Comment
KW
Hi Chetan,
Thanks for asking about our support model. We know how important it is for our customers to quickly get guidance and fixes from a team of...Read more
JSCAPE MFT Server has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
