Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ActiveBatch and Control-M 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ActiveBatch
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Astro by Astronomer
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RunMyJobs
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.7% of reviews)
Enterprise (62.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Starting at $29,000.00 500 Executions Per Month
ActiveBatch
Star Rating
(213)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Learn more about ActiveBatchControl-M
Star Rating
(107)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (62.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $29,000.00 500 Executions Per Month
Learn more about Control-MSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Control-M excels in "Job Scheduling" with a score of 9.4, while ActiveBatch Workload Automation shines even brighter with a score of 9.6, indicating a more robust scheduling capability that users find beneficial for complex workflows.
- Reviewers mention that Control-M's "Error Management - Runbook Automation" features are solid, but ActiveBatch's capabilities in "Error Management in Automation" and "Runbook Procedure Updates" are rated higher, suggesting a more comprehensive approach to handling errors during automated processes.
- G2 users highlight Control-M's "Real-Time Data Collection" as a standout feature with a score of 9.7, but users on G2 also note that ActiveBatch's "Data Lake" functionality, rated at 9.3, provides a more integrated data management solution for analytics and reporting.
- Reviewers say that Control-M's "Administration Console" is user-friendly with a score of 8.5, while ActiveBatch's console is rated higher at 8.9, indicating a more intuitive interface that simplifies administrative tasks.
- Users report that Control-M's "Proactive Workflow" capabilities are effective, scoring 9.1, but ActiveBatch's similar feature is rated slightly lower at 9.0, suggesting that while both products are strong, Control-M may offer a slight edge in anticipating workflow issues.
- Users on G2 mention that Control-M's "Compliance" features score well at 9.0, but ActiveBatch's "Service Management" is rated higher at 9.1, indicating a more comprehensive approach to ensuring compliance and managing services effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ActiveBatch
Simple, Usage-Based Pricing
Contact Us
- Ease of use - connect to your entire tech stack with our low-code API adapter and no-code connectors for SQL Server, SharePoint, Informatica, ServiceNow, VMware and more.
- Outstanding out-of-the-box features, including predictive SLA, change management, auto-remediation and a complete managed transfer file suite.
- Monitoring, alerting and reporting - reduce time troubleshooting and manage dependencies better with flexible and customizable monitoring and alerting.
Control-M
Starter Pack (SaaS)
Starting at $29,000.00
500 Executions Per Month
Full-featured Control-M SaaS orchestration — right-sized for growing teams and hybrid cloud apps.
- Visual Workflow Designer
- Cloud native & hybrid app integration
- API jobs, event triggers, file transfer
Free Trial
ActiveBatch
Free Trial is available
Control-M
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
163
9.0
70
Ease of Use
8.8
161
8.7
71
Ease of Setup
8.4
112
8.1
38
Ease of Admin
8.7
101
8.6
30
Quality of Support
8.9
155
8.5
67
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
99
9.1
31
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
150
8.3
67
Features by Category
Automation
9.3
98
9.0
43
9.0
92
8.6
41
9.1
57
8.3
23
Administration
9.0
96
8.2
35
9.2
90
8.8
38
8.9
75
8.4
37
9.0
55
8.3
23
9.1
58
8.6
21
9.1
52
8.4
22
Functionality
9.5
100
9.3
43
8.7
77
8.1
35
9.0
50
8.3
23
Agentic AI - Workload Automation
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
7.6
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
7.1
7
Not enough data
7.9
7
Data Delivery
8.7
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.4
45
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
39
|
Verified
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
44
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
45
|
Verified
Not enough data
Governance
8.8
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
Core Transfer Infrastructure - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.7
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Capabilities - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.6
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance Controls - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.8
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
Intelligent Automation & AI - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Development
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration Options
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
9.4
21
Not enough data
9.2
20
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
Functionality
8.6
18
Not enough data
9.2
21
Not enough data
9.0
19
Not enough data
Administration
9.3
22
Not enough data
9.3
23
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Data Warehouse Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation Support - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Error Management - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Compliance and Reporting - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Process Orchestration
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration & Adaptability - Process Orchestration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Integrations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Processing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.2
6
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ActiveBatch and Control-M are categorized as Workload Automation
Unique Categories
ActiveBatch is categorized as Data Warehouse Automation, Managed File Transfer (MFT), and Process Orchestration
Control-M is categorized as Runbook Automation, Big Data Processing and Distribution, iPaaS, Build Automation, Continuous Integration, Continuous Delivery, and Big Data Integration Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ActiveBatch
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Control-M
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
18.0%
Financial Services
17.1%
Hospital & Health Care
7.6%
Insurance
6.6%
Banking
6.2%
Other
44.5%
Information Technology and Services
27.4%
Banking
8.4%
Retail
7.4%
Insurance
7.4%
Financial Services
7.4%
Other
42.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job. This is one area where the documentation can use recommendations. For example, I want to see how the job performed, via the log, from 10 days ago. Today, the log would show GetFile failed if older than three days, or thereabouts.
1 Comment
KW
All jobs have properties that determine how job log files are managed. The factory default setting is Centrally Managed Logging. This means that the location...Read more
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job?
1 Comment
NA
create a log file instead of having active batch manage it,Read more
ActiveBatch has no more discussions with answers
What does control-M software do?
1 Comment
SS
I used it in banking requirrd to automate job and scheduler.Read more
Is Control-M an ETL tool?
1 Comment
LV
Yes. Control-M is used for scheduling and monitoring the jobs in ETL.Read more
What is workflow in control-M?
1 Comment
LV
Control-M Workflow Insights provides valuable dashboards that give users in-depth observability to continuously monitor and improve performance of the...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
