Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ActiveBatch and Files.com 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
SFTP To Go
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
StorageLink
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Couchdrop
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.7% of reviews)
Mid-Market (45.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial
ActiveBatch
Star Rating
(213)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Learn more about ActiveBatchFiles.com
Star Rating
(258)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Files.com excels in File Transfer Acceleration with a score of 9.3, allowing for faster and more efficient file transfers compared to ActiveBatch's score of 9.4, which, while still strong, does not match the specific focus on speed that Files.com offers.
- Reviewers mention that Files.com has a superior Ease of Setup rating of 9.4, making it more user-friendly for new users, while ActiveBatch's score of 8.3 indicates a more complex setup process that may require additional time and resources.
- G2 users highlight Files.com’s strong Quality of Support with a score of 9.4, suggesting that users feel well-supported, whereas ActiveBatch's score of 8.9 indicates room for improvement in customer service responsiveness.
- Users on G2 appreciate Files.com for its File Management capabilities, scoring 9.4, which includes features like version control and easy access, while ActiveBatch's offerings in this area are less emphasized, leading to a score of 8.9.
- Reviewers mention that ActiveBatch shines in Job Scheduling with a score of 9.6, indicating robust capabilities for automating tasks, while Files.com, although strong, scores slightly lower at 8.9, suggesting that ActiveBatch may be better suited for complex scheduling needs.
- Users report that Files.com provides excellent Data Management features with a score of 9.1, which includes intuitive data organization and retrieval, while ActiveBatch's score of 8.6 indicates that its data management features may not be as user-friendly or comprehensive.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ActiveBatch
Simple, Usage-Based Pricing
Contact Us
- Ease of use - connect to your entire tech stack with our low-code API adapter and no-code connectors for SQL Server, SharePoint, Informatica, ServiceNow, VMware and more.
- Outstanding out-of-the-box features, including predictive SLA, change management, auto-remediation and a complete managed transfer file suite.
- Monitoring, alerting and reporting - reduce time troubleshooting and manage dependencies better with flexible and customizable monitoring and alerting.
Files.com
Files.com
Free Trial
Join over 4,000 companies who trust Files.com for Secure File Orchestration. Your 7 Day Free Trial Includes:
- Full access to the entire Files.com platform, including all integrations, automations, protocols, and APIs
- Unlimited access to the industry's best support and onboarding team (we're rated #1 on G2)
- All the transfer, storage, and API calls that you need for your PoC and trial testing
Free Trial
ActiveBatch
Free Trial is available
Files.com
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
163
9.5
220
Ease of Use
8.8
161
9.3
226
Ease of Setup
8.4
112
9.4
201
Ease of Admin
8.7
101
9.3
180
Quality of Support
8.9
155
9.5
189
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
99
9.4
176
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
150
9.2
206
Features by Category
Automation
9.3
98
Not enough data
9.0
92
Not enough data
9.1
57
Not enough data
Administration
9.0
96
Not enough data
9.2
90
Not enough data
8.9
75
Not enough data
9.0
55
Not enough data
9.1
58
Not enough data
9.1
52
Not enough data
Functionality
9.5
100
Not enough data
8.7
77
Not enough data
9.0
50
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Workload Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Delivery
8.7
34
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
8.7
47
|
Verified
9.0
88
9.4
45
|
Verified
9.1
84
9.0
39
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
Functionality
8.8
24
|
Verified
8.7
84
8.6
34
|
Verified
9.4
89
8.8
44
|
Verified
9.1
86
7.8
45
|
Verified
8.4
87
Governance
8.8
46
|
Verified
8.8
88
8.9
36
|
Verified
9.3
86
9.0
47
|
Verified
9.5
87
Core Transfer Infrastructure - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.7
34
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.9
23
Not enough data
9.3
23
Not enough data
8.5
23
Platform Capabilities - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.6
34
|
Verified
9.4
89
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
8.6
21
Not enough data
9.2
20
Security & Compliance Controls - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.8
46
|
Verified
8.8
88
8.9
36
|
Verified
9.3
86
9.0
47
|
Verified
9.5
87
Intelligent Automation & AI - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Not enough data
6.8
19
Not enough data
6.8
19
Not enough data
6.9
19
Not enough data
7.4
19
Management
Not enough data
9.5
160
Not enough data
9.3
145
Not enough data
9.0
131
Not enough data
9.4
154
Functionality
Not enough data
9.7
160
Not enough data
9.0
120
Not enough data
9.1
125
Not enough data
8.5
117
Security
Not enough data
9.3
139
Not enough data
9.5
152
Not enough data
9.5
154
Development
Not enough data
9.2
20
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
9.4
11
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
8.5
10
Management
Not enough data
8.2
12
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Security
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
8.9
12
Not enough data
9.7
11
Integration Options
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
9.7
11
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
7.1
7
Deployment
Not enough data
9.5
10
Not enough data
9.2
11
Automation
9.4
21
Not enough data
9.2
20
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
Functionality
8.6
18
Not enough data
9.2
21
Not enough data
9.0
19
Not enough data
Administration
9.3
22
Not enough data
9.3
23
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Data Warehouse Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Process Orchestration
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration & Adaptability - Process Orchestration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ActiveBatch and Files.com are categorized as Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Unique Categories
ActiveBatch is categorized as Data Warehouse Automation, Workload Automation, and Process Orchestration
Files.com is categorized as File Transfer Protocol (FTP) and iPaaS
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ActiveBatch
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Files.com
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
18.0%
Financial Services
17.1%
Hospital & Health Care
7.6%
Insurance
6.6%
Banking
6.2%
Other
44.5%
Computer Software
10.3%
Information Technology and Services
9.9%
Hospital & Health Care
9.5%
Financial Services
5.5%
Retail
4.0%
Other
60.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job. This is one area where the documentation can use recommendations. For example, I want to see how the job performed, via the log, from 10 days ago. Today, the log would show GetFile failed if older than three days, or thereabouts.
1 Comment
KW
All jobs have properties that determine how job log files are managed. The factory default setting is Centrally Managed Logging. This means that the location...Read more
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job?
1 Comment
NA
create a log file instead of having active batch manage it,Read more
ActiveBatch has no more discussions with answers
What is Brickftp?
2 Comments
KJ
BrickFTP is the former name of files.com. Same company. New name (as of a few years ago).Read more
How to use file com?
2 Comments
BB
I had to leave files.com because they raised their rates exponentially (as they all do once they think you have too much data there to switch). L8r!Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
