G2 reviewers report that Control-M excels in ease of implementation, with many users highlighting its intuitive onboarding process and seamless integration with various cloud platforms. This allows for a centralized view of workflows, which is particularly beneficial for organizations managing hybrid environments.
Users say that ActiveBatch shines in workflow centralization, making it easy to control and automate tasks from a single dashboard. Reviewers appreciate its ability to visualize complex processes, which helps guide employees through various steps, enhancing overall productivity.
According to verified reviews, Control-M has a higher overall satisfaction score, indicating that users feel more positively about their experience with the product. Many users commend its job scheduling capabilities and the flexibility it offers in managing both legacy and modern systems.
Reviewers mention that ActiveBatch offers impressive automation capabilities, particularly in scheduling and job management. Users find it effective for orchestrating complex workflows, which can significantly streamline business processes and improve coordination among teams.
G2 reviewers highlight that while Control-M has a strong presence in the enterprise market, it faces challenges with its pricing structure, which starts at $29,000. This may deter smaller organizations, whereas ActiveBatch's pricing model is more flexible, appealing to a broader range of businesses.
Users report that both products provide solid support, but ActiveBatch edges out slightly with higher ratings for quality of support. Reviewers appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of ActiveBatch's support team, which can be crucial for organizations relying on timely assistance for their automation needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ActiveBatch
Simple, Usage-Based Pricing
Contact Us
Ease of use - connect to your entire tech stack with our low-code API adapter and no-code connectors for SQL Server, SharePoint, Informatica, ServiceNow, VMware and more.
Outstanding out-of-the-box features, including predictive SLA, change management, auto-remediation and a complete managed transfer file suite.
Monitoring, alerting and reporting - reduce time troubleshooting and manage dependencies better with flexible and customizable monitoring and alerting.
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job. This is one area where the documentation can use recommendations. For example, I want to see how the job performed, via the log, from 10 days ago. Today, the log would show GetFile failed if older than three days, or thereabouts.
1 Comment
KW
All jobs have properties that determine how job log files are managed. The factory default setting is Centrally Managed Logging. This means that the location...Read more
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job?
1 Comment
NA
create a log file instead of having active batch manage it,Read more
I used it in banking requirrd to automate job and scheduler.Read more
Is Control-M an ETL tool?
1 Comment
LV
Yes. Control-M is used for scheduling and monitoring the jobs in ETL.Read more
What is workflow in control-M?
1 Comment
LV
Control-M Workflow Insights provides valuable dashboards that give users in-depth observability to continuously monitor and improve performance of the...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.