Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare ActiveBatch and AutoSys Workload Automation

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch
Star Rating
(213)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.7% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Learn more about ActiveBatch
AutoSys Workload Automation
AutoSys Workload Automation
Star Rating
(47)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.6% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AutoSys Workload Automation
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that ActiveBatch Workload Automation excels in "Workflow Automation" with a score of 9.5, while AutoSys Workload Automation, although strong, scores slightly lower at 9.2. Reviewers mention that ActiveBatch's intuitive interface makes it easier to design and manage workflows effectively.
  • Reviewers mention that ActiveBatch's "File Transfer Acceleration" feature, scoring 9.4, significantly enhances data delivery speed compared to AutoSys, which does not have a specific mention of this capability. Users on G2 appreciate how this feature streamlines their operations.
  • G2 users highlight that ActiveBatch's "Job Scheduling" functionality scores 9.6, outperforming AutoSys's 9.4. Users say that the flexibility and customization options in ActiveBatch allow for more tailored scheduling solutions, which is crucial for complex environments.
  • Users say that both products offer strong "API / Integrations" capabilities, but AutoSys scores slightly higher at 8.8 compared to ActiveBatch's 8.7. Reviewers mention that AutoSys has a more extensive library of pre-built integrations, making it easier to connect with existing systems.
  • Reviewers mention that ActiveBatch's "Proactive Workflow" feature, scoring 9.0, provides better IT issue identification compared to AutoSys's 8.3. Users report that this proactive approach helps in minimizing downtime and improving overall efficiency.
  • Users on G2 report that ActiveBatch's "Service Automation" feature scores 9.4, indicating a robust capability in automating service-related tasks, while AutoSys's score of 8.8 suggests it may not be as comprehensive in this area. Reviewers appreciate how ActiveBatch simplifies service management through automation.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ActiveBatch
Simple, Usage-Based Pricing
Contact Us
Learn more about ActiveBatch
AutoSys Workload Automation
No pricing available
Free Trial
ActiveBatch
Free Trial is available
AutoSys Workload Automation
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
163
9.1
34
Ease of Use
8.8
161
9.0
35
Ease of Setup
8.4
112
9.1
18
Ease of Admin
8.7
101
8.9
18
Quality of Support
8.9
155
8.8
33
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
99
9.3
18
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
150
8.8
30
Features by Category
9.1
109
8.9
21
Automation
9.3
98
9.2
20
9.0
92
9.1
21
9.1
57
8.7
20
Administration
9.0
96
8.8
18
9.2
90
9.4
20
8.9
75
8.8
16
9.0
55
8.3
18
9.1
58
8.5
19
9.1
52
8.8
18
Functionality
9.5
100
9.4
21
8.7
77
8.8
16
9.0
50
8.8
19
Agentic AI - Workload Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Managed File Transfer (MFT)Hide 26 FeaturesShow 26 Features
8.8
66
Not enough data
Data Delivery
8.7
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.4
45
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
39
|
Verified
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
44
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
45
|
Verified
Not enough data
Governance
8.8
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
Core Transfer Infrastructure - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.7
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Capabilities - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.6
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance Controls - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.8
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
Intelligent Automation & AI - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Warehouse AutomationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
9.1
26
Not enough data
Automation
9.4
21
Not enough data
9.2
20
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
Functionality
8.6
18
Not enough data
9.2
21
Not enough data
9.0
19
Not enough data
Administration
9.3
22
Not enough data
9.3
23
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Data Warehouse Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
Functionality - Process Orchestration
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration & Adaptability - Process Orchestration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch
AutoSys Workload Automation
AutoSys Workload Automation
ActiveBatch and AutoSys Workload Automation are categorized as Workload Automation
Unique Categories
AutoSys Workload Automation
AutoSys Workload Automation has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
19.9%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
37.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
42.7%
AutoSys Workload Automation
AutoSys Workload Automation
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
14.9%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
8.5%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
76.6%
Reviewers' Industry
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch
Information Technology and Services
18.0%
Financial Services
17.1%
Hospital & Health Care
7.6%
Insurance
6.6%
Banking
6.2%
Other
44.5%
AutoSys Workload Automation
AutoSys Workload Automation
Information Technology and Services
38.3%
Banking
19.1%
Computer Software
6.4%
Architecture & Planning
6.4%
Retail
4.3%
Other
25.5%
Alternatives
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch Alternatives
Stonebranch
Stonebranch
Add Stonebranch
JAMS
JAMS
Add JAMS
GoAnywhere MFT
GoAnywhere MFT
Add GoAnywhere MFT
Progress MOVEit
Progress MOVEit
Add Progress MOVEit
AutoSys Workload Automation
AutoSys Workload Automation Alternatives
Control-M
Control-M
Add Control-M
RunMyJobs
RunMyJobs
Add RunMyJobs
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Add PagerDuty
JAMS
JAMS
Add JAMS
Discussions
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch Discussions
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job. This is one area where the documentation can use recommendations. For example, I want to see how the job performed, via the log, from 10 days ago. Today, the log would show GetFile failed if older than three days, or thereabouts.
1 Comment
Katti W.
KW
All jobs have properties that determine how job log files are managed. The factory default setting is Centrally Managed Logging. This means that the location...Read more
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job?
1 Comment
Nazeer A.
NA
create a log file instead of having active batch manage it,Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
ActiveBatch has no more discussions with answers
AutoSys Workload Automation
AutoSys Workload Automation Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
AutoSys Workload Automation has no discussions with answers