Users report that ACRA's Quality of Support is significantly lower at 5.8 compared to Sentry's 8.4, indicating that Sentry provides a more responsive and helpful support experience.
Reviewers mention that ACRA's Ease of Use score of 7.6 falls short of Sentry's 8.6, suggesting that Sentry's interface and user experience are more intuitive for everyday users.
G2 users highlight that ACRA's Crash Monitoring capabilities are less robust than Sentry's, which excels in Constant Monitoring with a score of 9.3, ensuring users receive timely alerts and can address issues promptly.
Users on G2 report that Sentry's Real-Time Monitoring and Performance Monitoring features are superior, with scores of 8.8, providing better insights into application performance compared to ACRA.
Reviewers say that ACRA's Multi-Site Monitoring at 8.1 is commendable, but Sentry's overall functionality in this area is enhanced by its Dynamic Transaction Mapping feature, which scored 7.6, allowing for more detailed tracking of user interactions.
Users report that Sentry's Reporting capabilities, scoring 8.9, are more comprehensive than ACRA's, making it easier for teams to analyze data and generate insights effectively.
What is your primary use case for Sentry in application monitoring, and how has it impacted your development process?
1 Comment
JD
You can intergrate senty with your application to get the errors on your email or simply getting notified when your system fails or give you any kind of...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.