When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Acoustic Content easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Acoustic Content overall.
Reviewers felt that Acoustic Content meets the needs of their business better than Adobe Experience Manager.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Acoustic Content is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Acoustic Content over Adobe Experience Manager.
It is a cloud-based CMS that manages digital assets and structured content which can be accessed via a rich API and published to the Akamai Content Delivery...Read more
Who uses IBM Watson Hub?
1 Comment
Official Response from Acoustic Content
Project teams that need an easy-to-use content repository for content and assets used in multiple customer touch-points such as mobile apps, websites, and...Read more
How is IBM Watson Content Hub priced?
1 Comment
Official Response from Acoustic Content
This multi-tenet SaaS offering is sold on a consumption basis, based on the quantity of storage used and the data transfer consumed, NOT on a per-user basis,...Read more
A couple of years ago Adobe was excited about AEM in the cloud SaaS, but this offering seems to have quietly gone away. We use AEM at Rackspace where we have...Read more
What is the best way to use
1 Comment
MR
Adobe Experience Manager as a Cloud Service is the best way to use, which makes AEM SaaS.Read more
How to reduce the reindex time for large index
1 Comment
MR
We can reduce the indexing time by creating Lucene Index.Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.