Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ACCELQ and Postman 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
HAProxy
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.8% of reviews)
Mid-Market (37.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 User Per Year
Free
ACCELQ
Star Rating
(93)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 User Per Year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 6 pricing plansPostman
Star Rating
(1,661)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Postman excels in its user-friendly interface, scoring 9.1 in Ease of Use, while ACCELQ shines even brighter with a score of 9.7, making it particularly appealing for teams looking for a seamless onboarding experience.
- Reviewers mention that Postman has a strong community and extensive documentation, contributing to its 8.7 Quality of Support score. In contrast, ACCELQ users highlight the exceptional support they receive, reflected in a score of 9.5, with many praising the responsiveness of their support team.
- G2 users note that Postman’s autonomous task execution capabilities score 8.3, which is decent but falls short compared to ACCELQ’s perfect score of 10.0, where users appreciate the platform's ability to automate testing without extensive manual intervention.
- Reviewers say that while Postman offers a free version, ACCELQ provides a free trial that allows users to explore its advanced features before committing, which is particularly beneficial for enterprises looking to evaluate the software's capabilities.
- Users on G2 report that Postman has a solid product direction with a score of 9.1, but ACCELQ stands out with a perfect score of 10.0, indicating a strong commitment to continuous improvement and innovation, which is crucial for long-term investment.
- Users mention that Postman’s natural language interaction features score 8.0, which some find limiting, whereas ACCELQ’s perfect score of 10.0 in this area is praised for its intuitive design that allows users to create tests using natural language, enhancing accessibility for non-technical team members.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ACCELQ
Automate Manual
Contact Us
1 User Per Year
Next-generation manual testing tool with tracking, traceability, and integrations
- Scenario Designer
- Parameterization and data driven testing
- Parameterization and data driven testing
Postman
Free Plan
Free
For individuals or a small team of 3 or less to start testing APIs.
- Up to 3 collaborators
- Access to API Client
- 3 Packages
Free Trial
ACCELQ
Free Trial is available
Postman
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
84
9.3
1,307
Ease of Use
9.5
85
9.1
1,323
Ease of Setup
9.3
53
9.3
569
Ease of Admin
8.8
20
8.9
183
Quality of Support
9.3
81
8.7
1,087
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
20
9.0
155
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
79
9.2
1,267
Features by Category
Functionality
9.8
15
Not enough data
9.7
15
Not enough data
9.7
15
Not enough data
Management
9.5
14
Not enough data
9.2
15
Not enough data
9.6
15
Not enough data
API Management
Not enough data
8.8
147
Not enough data
9.1
149
Not enough data
8.7
145
Not enough data
8.7
141
Security Testing
Not enough data
8.7
140
Not enough data
9.4
143
Not enough data
9.5
147
Security Management
Not enough data
8.8
137
Not enough data
8.4
135
Not enough data
8.0
135
Development
Not enough data
9.5
564
Not enough data
8.8
516
Not enough data
8.7
497
Not enough data
8.8
509
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.8
522
Not enough data
8.8
501
Not enough data
8.9
512
Functionality
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.6
20
Not enough data
Management
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.7
20
Not enough data
Functionality
9.5
27
Not enough data
9.5
27
Not enough data
9.7
28
Not enough data
Management
9.8
28
Not enough data
9.5
28
Not enough data
9.6
28
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.4
31
Not enough data
9.1
29
Not enough data
8.9
30
Not enough data
9.6
30
Usability
Not enough data
9.1
29
Not enough data
9.0
31
Not enough data
9.5
33
Functionality
9.3
70
Not enough data
9.5
70
Not enough data
9.2
69
Not enough data
9.3
69
Not enough data
Automation
9.2
68
Not enough data
9.4
70
Not enough data
9.3
70
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.4
17
Not enough data
8.4
17
Functionality - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.2
16
Not enough data
8.1
16
Not enough data
7.8
16
Not enough data
8.0
16
Data and Analytics - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
9.0
15
Integration - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.9
17
Not enough data
8.9
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Development - API Platforms
Not enough data
9.4
313
Not enough data
8.9
294
Not enough data
8.7
281
Not enough data
8.8
285
Collaboration - API Platforms
Not enough data
8.8
289
Not enough data
8.8
286
Not enough data
8.6
278
API Management - API Platforms
Not enough data
9.0
288
Not enough data
8.4
282
Not enough data
8.5
276
Not enough data
8.9
282
Not enough data
8.3
273
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
8.1
175
Not enough data
8.0
175
Not enough data
8.2
176
Agentic AI - Salesforce AppExchange Apps
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Construction
Not enough data
9.5
830
Not enough data
8.7
728
Not enough data
8.6
668
Not enough data
8.8
376
API Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
761
Not enough data
8.9
738
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.5
648
Data Integration
Not enough data
8.8
680
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ACCELQ and Postman are categorized as Software Testing
Unique Categories
ACCELQ is categorized as Continuous Integration, Automation Testing, Salesforce AppExchange Apps, Test Management, Mobile App Testing, and AI Software Testing Tools
Postman is categorized as Service Virtualization, API Platforms, API Development, API Security, API Management, Build Automation, and AI Agent Builders
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ACCELQ
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Postman
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
32.3%
Computer Software
14.0%
Hospital & Health Care
5.4%
Financial Services
5.4%
Retail
4.3%
Other
38.7%
Computer Software
34.9%
Information Technology and Services
30.9%
Financial Services
3.2%
Banking
2.0%
Internet
1.8%
Other
27.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Accelq tool?
1 Comment
GA
ACCELQ offers AI-powered No-Code test automation and management built on a cloud-native platform. ACCELQ provides a unified platform for web, mobile, API,...Read more
Is Accelq open source?
1 Comment
GA
ACCELQ Is currently not Open Source but a commercial tool. You can always take a FREE Trail to check its true power. As "Seeing is Believing,"Read more
ACCELQ has no more discussions with answers
What is Postman used for?
7 Comments
KK
Personnaly i used postman for connect multiple softwares through API.Read more
Is it possible to make such a service in the form of a Web App ?
3 Comments
VN
Hey Shrini,
We recently launched Postman on the Web feature to use on a browser. Make sure to install the Postman Agent file to bypass any CORDS...Read more
Is there any alternative?
3 Comments
LP
There exists Postwoman as an alternative:
https://postwoman.ioRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
