Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ACCELQ and Opentext functional Testing 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.8% of reviews)
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 User Per Year
No pricing available
ACCELQ
Star Rating
(93)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 User Per Year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 6 pricing plansOpentext functional Testing
Star Rating
(46)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Opentext functional TestingSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that ACCELQ excels in ease of use with a score of 9.6, while OpenText UFT One lags behind at 8.1. Reviewers mention that ACCELQ's intuitive interface significantly reduces the learning curve for new users.
- Reviewers say that ACCELQ's test repository functionality is rated at 9.8, highlighting its robust capabilities for managing and organizing test cases. In contrast, OpenText UFT One does not provide a comparable level of organization, with users rating it lower.
- G2 users indicate that ACCELQ's integration capabilities score 9.6, allowing seamless connections with various tools and platforms. Users on G2 mention that OpenText UFT One's integration options are more limited, which can hinder workflow efficiency.
- Users report that ACCELQ shines in test customization with a score of 9.7, enabling tailored testing scenarios. Reviewers mention that OpenText UFT One's customization features are less flexible, scoring only 8.1, which can restrict user adaptability.
- Reviewers mention that ACCELQ's automation capabilities are rated at 9.8, making it a strong choice for users looking to streamline their testing processes. In contrast, OpenText UFT One's automation features receive a lower score of 8.1, indicating room for improvement.
- Users say that ACCELQ's reporting functionality is rated at 9.5, providing detailed insights into test performance. Users on G2 report that OpenText UFT One's reporting features are less comprehensive, scoring only 8.1, which can affect decision-making based on test results.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ACCELQ
Automate Manual
Contact Us
1 User Per Year
Next-generation manual testing tool with tracking, traceability, and integrations
- Scenario Designer
- Parameterization and data driven testing
- Parameterization and data driven testing
Opentext functional Testing
No pricing availableFree Trial
ACCELQ
Free Trial is available
Opentext functional Testing
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
84
8.7
40
Ease of Use
9.5
85
8.1
39
Ease of Setup
9.3
53
8.1
19
Ease of Admin
8.8
20
8.2
18
Quality of Support
9.3
81
8.5
38
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
20
8.4
16
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
79
8.1
37
Features by Category
Functionality
9.8
15
Not enough data
9.7
15
Not enough data
9.7
15
Not enough data
Management
9.5
14
Not enough data
9.2
15
Not enough data
9.6
15
Not enough data
Functionality
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.6
20
Not enough data
Management
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.7
20
Not enough data
Functionality
9.5
27
Not enough data
9.5
27
Not enough data
9.7
28
Not enough data
Management
9.8
28
Not enough data
9.5
28
Not enough data
9.6
28
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
70
8.1
8
9.5
70
7.9
8
9.2
69
8.1
8
9.3
69
8.3
8
Automation
9.2
68
8.1
8
9.4
70
7.7
8
9.3
70
8.1
8
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Salesforce AppExchange Apps
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ACCELQ and Opentext functional Testing are categorized as Automation Testing and Software Testing
Unique Categories
ACCELQ is categorized as Continuous Integration, Salesforce AppExchange Apps, Test Management, Mobile App Testing, and AI Software Testing Tools
Opentext functional Testing has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ACCELQ
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Opentext functional Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
32.3%
Computer Software
14.0%
Hospital & Health Care
5.4%
Financial Services
5.4%
Retail
4.3%
Other
38.7%
Information Technology and Services
35.6%
Computer Software
15.6%
Banking
6.7%
Hospital & Health Care
4.4%
Education Management
4.4%
Other
33.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Accelq tool?
1 Comment
GA
ACCELQ offers AI-powered No-Code test automation and management built on a cloud-native platform. ACCELQ provides a unified platform for web, mobile, API,...Read more
Is Accelq open source?
1 Comment
GA
ACCELQ Is currently not Open Source but a commercial tool. You can always take a FREE Trail to check its true power. As "Seeing is Believing,"Read more
ACCELQ has no more discussions with answers
Which feature of Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing displays VBScript code?
1 Comment
SZ
Expert View, In this the users can view and edit the test's source code using VBScriptRead more
Opentext functional Testing has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
