Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare ACCELQ and OpenText Application Quality Management

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
ACCELQ
ACCELQ
Star Rating
(93)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.8% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 User Per Year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 6 pricing plans
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality Management
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring 9.1, which allows for efficient management of test cases and results. In contrast, ACCELQ shines even brighter with a score of 9.8, offering a more intuitive interface for organizing and accessing test cases.
  • Reviewers mention that ACCELQ's ease of use is a standout feature, with a score of 9.6, making it highly accessible for teams new to test management. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while functional, has a lower ease of use rating at 7.8, indicating a steeper learning curve for new users.
  • G2 users highlight ACCELQ's superior integration capabilities, scoring 9.6, which allows seamless connections with various tools and platforms. OpenText ALM Quality Center, with a score of 8.1, offers integrations but lacks the breadth and ease that users find in ACCELQ.
  • Reviewers say that ACCELQ's automation features are particularly robust, with a score of 9.7, enabling teams to streamline their testing processes effectively. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while offering automation, scores lower at 9.0, suggesting it may not be as comprehensive in this area.
  • Users on G2 report that ACCELQ provides better test feedback mechanisms, scoring 9.4, which enhances communication among team members regarding test results. OpenText ALM Quality Center, with a score of 8.3, does not facilitate feedback as effectively, leading to potential gaps in communication.
  • Reviewers mention that ACCELQ's reporting capabilities are highly praised, scoring 9.5, which allows for detailed insights into testing progress and outcomes. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while functional, scores 8.9, indicating that its reporting features may not be as user-friendly or comprehensive as those offered by ACCELQ.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ACCELQ
Automate Manual
Contact Us
1 User Per Year
Browse all 6 pricing plans
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing available
Free Trial
ACCELQ
Free Trial is available
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
84
8.2
118
Ease of Use
9.5
85
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
9.3
53
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
8.8
20
7.2
59
Quality of Support
9.3
81
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
20
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
79
6.8
116
Features by Category
9.9
59
8.8
11
Functionality
9.8
15
9.2
10
9.7
15
8.2
10
9.7
15
9.2
10
Management
9.5
14
8.8
10
9.2
15
8.8
10
9.6
15
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
13
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.9
64
Not enough data
Functionality
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.6
20
Not enough data
Management
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.7
20
Not enough data
Continuous IntegrationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
9.9
72
Not enough data
Functionality
9.5
27
Not enough data
9.5
27
Not enough data
9.7
28
Not enough data
Management
9.8
28
Not enough data
9.5
28
Not enough data
9.6
28
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.6
117
8.7
6
Functionality
9.3
70
8.3
5
9.5
70
8.7
5
9.2
69
7.7
5
9.3
69
9.0
5
Automation
9.2
68
9.7
5
9.4
70
8.7
5
9.3
70
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.9
45
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Salesforce AppExchange AppsHide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
10.0
44
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Salesforce AppExchange Apps
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Software Testing ToolsHide 9 FeaturesShow 9 Features
9.9
45
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Requirements ManagementHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ACCELQ
ACCELQ
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
ACCELQ and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Automation Testing, Test Management, and Software Testing
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Requirements Management, ALM Software, Bug Tracking, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ACCELQ
ACCELQ
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
23.7%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
39.8%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
36.6%
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
12.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
21.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
66.4%
Reviewers' Industry
ACCELQ
ACCELQ
Information Technology and Services
32.3%
Computer Software
14.0%
Hospital & Health Care
5.4%
Financial Services
5.4%
Retail
4.3%
Other
38.7%
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Alternatives
ACCELQ
ACCELQ Alternatives
Katalon Platform
Katalon Platform
Add Katalon Platform
Provar
Provar
Add Provar
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
UiPath Agentic Automation
UiPath Agentic Automation
Add UiPath Agentic Automation
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management Alternatives
Perforce ALM
Perforce ALM
Add Perforce ALM
TestRail
TestRail
Add TestRail
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Add Tricentis qTest
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
Add Zephyr Enterprise
Discussions
ACCELQ
ACCELQ Discussions
What is Accelq tool?
1 Comment
Geosley A.
GA
ACCELQ offers AI-powered No-Code test automation and management built on a cloud-native platform. ACCELQ provides a unified platform for web, mobile, API,...Read more
Is Accelq open source?
1 Comment
Geosley A.
GA
ACCELQ Is currently not Open Source but a commercial tool. You can always take a FREE Trail to check its true power. As "Seeing is Believing,"Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
ACCELQ has no more discussions with answers
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
Petr K.
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers