Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ACCELQ and mabl 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
PFLB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Octopus Deploy
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.8% of reviews)
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 User Per Year
Contact Us Per Year
ACCELQ
Star Rating
(93)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 User Per Year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 6 pricing plansmabl
Star Rating
(37)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about mablSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that ACCELQ excels in its Test Repository feature, scoring an impressive 9.8, which allows for efficient management and retrieval of test cases, while mabl, although strong, scores slightly lower in this area.
- Reviewers mention that ACCELQ's Test Customization capabilities are highly rated at 9.7, enabling users to tailor tests to their specific needs, whereas mabl's customization options, rated at 8.8, may not offer the same level of flexibility.
- G2 users highlight ACCELQ's superior Test Feedback functionality, with a score of 9.4, which provides actionable insights post-testing, while mabl's feedback mechanism, rated at 9.1, is seen as less comprehensive.
- Users on G2 appreciate ACCELQ's Automation features, scoring 9.8, which streamline testing processes significantly, while mabl's automation capabilities, rated at 8.3, are perceived as less robust in comparison.
- Reviewers say that ACCELQ's Reporting Management is a standout feature with a score of 9.5, offering detailed analytics and insights, while mabl's reporting, although useful, scores lower at 8.3, indicating room for improvement.
- Users report that ACCELQ's Reliability is rated at 9.5, ensuring consistent performance during testing, while mabl, with a reliability score of 9.0, is still dependable but may not match the same level of consistency as ACCELQ.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ACCELQ
Automate Manual
Contact Us
1 User Per Year
Next-generation manual testing tool with tracking, traceability, and integrations
- Scenario Designer
- Parameterization and data driven testing
- Parameterization and data driven testing
mabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Pricing is customized to your test coverage and scalability needs.
- Your pricing session will include:
- A custom quote
- ROI analysis
Free Trial
ACCELQ
Free Trial is available
mabl
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
84
8.6
28
Ease of Use
9.5
85
9.0
28
Ease of Setup
9.3
53
8.8
11
Ease of Admin
8.8
20
9.0
5
Quality of Support
9.3
81
9.2
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
20
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
79
8.7
26
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.8
15
Not enough data
9.7
15
Not enough data
9.7
15
Not enough data
Management
9.5
14
Not enough data
9.2
15
Not enough data
9.6
15
Not enough data
Functionality
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.6
20
Not enough data
Management
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.7
20
Not enough data
Functionality
9.5
27
Not enough data
9.5
27
Not enough data
9.7
28
Not enough data
Management
9.8
28
Not enough data
9.5
28
Not enough data
9.6
28
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
70
9.1
17
9.5
70
9.2
17
9.2
69
8.8
17
9.3
69
8.5
17
Automation
9.2
68
8.3
16
9.4
70
9.0
17
9.3
70
8.8
17
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Salesforce AppExchange Apps
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ACCELQ and mabl are categorized as Automation Testing, Software Testing, and AI Software Testing Tools
Unique Categories
ACCELQ is categorized as Continuous Integration, Salesforce AppExchange Apps, Test Management, and Mobile App Testing
mabl is categorized as Load Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ACCELQ
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
mabl
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
32.3%
Computer Software
14.0%
Hospital & Health Care
5.4%
Financial Services
5.4%
Retail
4.3%
Other
38.7%
Computer Software
30.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
5.6%
Insurance
5.6%
Higher Education
5.6%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
Other
47.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Accelq tool?
1 Comment
GA
ACCELQ offers AI-powered No-Code test automation and management built on a cloud-native platform. ACCELQ provides a unified platform for web, mobile, API,...Read more
Is Accelq open source?
1 Comment
GA
ACCELQ Is currently not Open Source but a commercial tool. You can always take a FREE Trail to check its true power. As "Seeing is Believing,"Read more
ACCELQ has no more discussions with answers
What does mabl do?
1 Comment
CS
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 Comment
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs.
It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 Comment
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
