Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ACCELQ and Cypress 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (42.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 User Per Year
Free
ACCELQ
Star Rating
(93)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 User Per Year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 6 pricing plansCypress
Star Rating
(107)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (42.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 5 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that ACCELQ's Test Repository feature scores exceptionally high at 9.8, allowing for seamless management of test cases, while Cypress users mention that although it offers a solid repository, it doesn't match the same level of organization and ease of access.
- Reviewers mention that ACCELQ excels in Test Customization with a score of 9.7, enabling users to tailor tests to their specific needs, whereas Cypress users say that while customization is possible, it can be more complex and less intuitive.
- G2 users highlight ACCELQ's Integration capabilities, scoring 9.6, which allows for smooth connections with various tools, while users on G2 report that Cypress, although it has good integration options, sometimes lacks the depth and variety that ACCELQ provides.
- Users say that ACCELQ's Quality of Support is rated at 9.3, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, while Cypress users report a slightly lower satisfaction at 8.8, indicating room for improvement in customer service.
- Reviewers mention that ACCELQ's Automation feature shines with a score of 9.8, making it easy to automate tests efficiently, while users report that Cypress, with a score of 9.7, also offers strong automation capabilities but may require more manual setup for certain tasks.
- Users on G2 highlight ACCELQ's Product Direction score of 10.0, indicating a strong confidence in the product's future development, while Cypress users mention a solid score of 9.5, suggesting that while the product is evolving, there may be some uncertainty about its long-term roadmap.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ACCELQ
Automate Manual
Contact Us
1 User Per Year
Next-generation manual testing tool with tracking, traceability, and integrations
- Scenario Designer
- Parameterization and data driven testing
- Parameterization and data driven testing
Cypress
OSS - Cypress Test Runner
Free
Always free and open source. No restrictions or limitations.
- http://download.cypress.io/desktop or 'npm install cypress'
Free Trial
ACCELQ
Free Trial is available
Cypress
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
84
9.0
92
Ease of Use
9.5
85
9.2
93
Ease of Setup
9.3
53
9.3
18
Ease of Admin
8.8
20
9.3
14
Quality of Support
9.3
81
8.8
74
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
20
9.3
10
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
79
9.5
90
Features by Category
Functionality
9.8
15
Not enough data
9.7
15
Not enough data
9.7
15
Not enough data
Management
9.5
14
Not enough data
9.2
15
Not enough data
9.6
15
Not enough data
Functionality
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.6
20
Not enough data
Management
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.7
20
Not enough data
Functionality
9.5
27
Not enough data
9.5
27
Not enough data
9.7
28
Not enough data
Management
9.8
28
Not enough data
9.5
28
Not enough data
9.6
28
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
70
9.0
5
9.5
70
9.0
5
9.2
69
9.3
5
9.3
69
8.7
5
Automation
9.2
68
6.7
5
9.4
70
9.3
5
9.3
70
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Salesforce AppExchange Apps
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ACCELQ and Cypress are categorized as Automation Testing and Software Testing
Unique Categories
ACCELQ is categorized as Continuous Integration, Salesforce AppExchange Apps, Test Management, Mobile App Testing, and AI Software Testing Tools
Cypress has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ACCELQ
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Cypress
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
32.3%
Computer Software
14.0%
Hospital & Health Care
5.4%
Financial Services
5.4%
Retail
4.3%
Other
38.7%
Computer Software
42.3%
Information Technology and Services
20.2%
Financial Services
7.7%
Program Development
3.8%
Marketing and Advertising
2.9%
Other
23.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Accelq tool?
1 Comment
GA
ACCELQ offers AI-powered No-Code test automation and management built on a cloud-native platform. ACCELQ provides a unified platform for web, mobile, API,...Read more
Is Accelq open source?
1 Comment
GA
ACCELQ Is currently not Open Source but a commercial tool. You can always take a FREE Trail to check its true power. As "Seeing is Believing,"Read more
ACCELQ has no more discussions with answers
Are their any resources or individuals to help us connect our app authenticating with IdentityServer
1 Comment
SR
Try cy.pause, intract with app for identity and then resume. Or use api calls.Read more
Is there a plan to add firefox to the list of supported browsers?
1 Comment
SR
Firefox and edge are supported in cypress 4.0Read more
How can I influence my lead QA engineer positively to to use Cypress? Cross-browser is a factor.
1 Comment
SR
Cypress 4.0 add Firefox and edge browsers.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
