Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Acceldata and IBM Databand 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
DataGroomr
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Solvexia
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Code Cube DataLayer Guard
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (60.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (39.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us 1 GB / Month of Metadata Logged Per Year
Acceldata
Star Rating
(49)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (60.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about AcceldataIBM Databand
Star Rating
(67)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 GB / Month of Metadata Logged Per Year
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Acceldata excels in data quality monitoring with a score of 8.0, while IBM Databand shines with a higher score of 8.6, indicating that users find IBM's capabilities more robust in ensuring data integrity.
- Reviewers mention that Acceldata's data observability feature is highly rated at 9.4, suggesting that users appreciate its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, whereas IBM Databand's observability features, while effective, do not reach the same level of user satisfaction.
- G2 users highlight that Acceldata offers strong self-service options with a score of 8.6, making it easier for users to manage their data independently, while IBM Databand's self-service capabilities are perceived as less intuitive, scoring lower in user feedback.
- Users on G2 report that IBM Databand provides superior real-time analytics with a score of 8.6, which reviewers say enhances decision-making speed, compared to Acceldata's score of 8.0, indicating a preference for IBM's analytics capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that Acceldata's automated workflows feature, scoring 7.6, could use improvement, while IBM Databand's automation features are rated slightly higher at 8.2, suggesting a more streamlined experience for users.
- Users say that both products perform well in data governance, but Acceldata's score of 8.1 is slightly lower than IBM Databand's 8.6, indicating that users find IBM's governance tools more effective in managing data compliance and security.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Acceldata
No pricing availableIBM Databand
Growth
Contact Us
1 GB / Month of Metadata Logged Per Year
- Monitored Pipelines | < 100
- Metadata Logged | Up to 500MB / month
- Alerting | Email. Slack. Pagerduty. Opsgenie
Free Trial
Acceldata
Free Trial is available
IBM Databand
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
47
8.6
60
Ease of Use
8.5
48
8.6
62
Ease of Setup
8.1
40
8.3
31
Ease of Admin
8.5
27
8.0
23
Quality of Support
9.0
45
8.9
58
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
24
8.3
23
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
48
9.4
58
Features by Category
Data Source Access
Not enough data
8.6
27
Not enough data
8.6
29
Not enough data
8.8
28
Data Interaction
Not enough data
8.3
27
Not enough data
8.5
29
Not enough data
8.4
29
Not enough data
8.8
28
Not enough data
8.7
28
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
8.6
28
Not enough data
8.6
29
Data Exporting
Not enough data
8.5
27
Not enough data
8.2
28
Not enough data
8.8
29
Generative AI
Not enough data
8.5
8
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Quality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Maintainence
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Data Governance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
14
Not enough data
8.2
14
Not enough data
8.2
13
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
7.9
13
Not enough data
8.3
13
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Database Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
8.6
12
Not enough data
8.1
12
Not enough data
8.8
12
Not enough data
7.5
12
Not enough data
Agentic AI - DataOps Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytics
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
Monitoring and Management
9.4
9
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
Cloud Deployment
8.3
8
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.2
29
8.6
46
8.2
28
8.6
45
8.2
28
8.2
45
8.3
29
8.9
46
Management
8.5
26
8.3
45
8.1
25
8.3
42
8.3
25
8.5
44
7.6
24
8.7
42
8.1
25
8.6
44
Generative AI
6.7
17
7.3
11
Agentic AI - Data Observability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.2
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
Management
7.2
10
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.3
10
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.5
8
Not enough data
6.9
8
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Acceldata and IBM Databand are categorized as Data Observability
Unique Categories
Acceldata is categorized as DataOps Platforms, Database Monitoring, Data Quality, and Data Governance
IBM Databand is categorized as Data Preparation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Acceldata
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
IBM Databand
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Computer Software
16.7%
Telecommunications
14.6%
Marketing and Advertising
10.4%
Food & Beverages
8.3%
Other
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Computer Software
19.7%
Retail
9.1%
Computer & Network Security
7.6%
Financial Services
6.1%
Other
34.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
Acceldata has no discussions with answers
IBM Databand has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
